The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2792 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I am just trying to work out what £1 million represents in the overall picture.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
You cannot tell us what the errors are.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
But you can confirm that the £1 million relates solely to the 2024-25 budget.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on to one last area, which is the senior staffing situation that you mentioned previously. Paragraph 27 of your report says:
“The director of finance resigned in April 2025, and the principal resigned in May 2025. Five members of the board of management, including the chair, also resigned between April and May 2025.”
Can you provide any further information on those resignations and the recruitment that is taking place to replace the staff concerned?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Was there a trigger for that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
You mentioned UK PIP changes and their potential impact on the Scottish budget. You also said that there was no clear Scottish Government strategy for responding to that. Do you have any information at all on how the Scottish Government intends to protect Scottish finances against reforms to UK policy?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Coming at this from a slightly different angle, I note that your report highlights that the forecasts for the funding gap cover only direct expenditure and do not include implementation and operational costs. You highlight the implementation costs—if I recall correctly, there is an estimated accumulated figure of £715 million up to 2025-26—and the fact that operational spending in 2023-24 exceeded block grant funding by £275 million, which is a big gap. How sustainable is it for the Scottish Government to continue to fund that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
That takes me on to a daft-laddie question about the actual amount of the increase. You have given an indication that the increase is driven, for example, by higher take-up of benefits and so on, but that would not account for everything, because a lot of the higher take-up has already been factored in. What is the maths behind the calculation that gets you to £770 million? I suppose that you make an assumption about inflation and the amount by which the payments might be increased. What other variables do you take into account?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Can I assume that, at this point, there is no indication of the Scottish Government’s plans for how it will deal with that potential gap?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, I will continue with questions on the projected deficit. At the moment, the deficit is £141 million, and it is forecast to rise to £770 million by 2029-30. In your opening remarks, I think that you said that it “could grow” to £770 million. The forecast must be based on some existing factors that could be varied by external influence or the decisions of the Scottish Government. Will you run through what factors are driving that increase and what could be done to mitigate it?