The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 843 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
I thought that it was important to ask that question so that you could comment.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
I thank our guests for the enlightening discussion so far.
I have a question about what I think is a positive aspect of the bill. How might the bill’s provisions on pledges help businesses to access finance?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
That is extremely helpful.
My next question is about something that might not be quite so helpful, but I will ask it anyway. There are concerns that the statutory pledge provisions in the bill could in Scotland open up a high-cost lending market that could target vulnerable consumers. Do you have any idea of whether that is likely to happen?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
I am sorry to come back in. I think that this might have been covered earlier, but there is a general agreement about the £1,000 threshold in the bill. Obviously, that has been in place for quite a while. I have heard a few people say certain numbers; for example, I believe that £3,000 was mentioned last week. It will be updated to some degree, but do you have an idea or a clue as to what the best direction that it could go in might be?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
Everybody is pretty much of the opinion that it needs to be higher than the £1,000 threshold that has been broached. As Alan McIntosh mentioned, the more important element is possibly not so much where it starts—although it has to be higher than £1,000—but how it increases over time. That is really the important element. It is useful to have heard that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
I thank the witnesses very much for their evidence so far. You have answered quite a few things that I was going to ask, so I will go off on a bit of a tangent from where we have been so far. My question is more about businesses in communities. Do you think that the proposals in the bill, as presented, should apply equally to all businesses or should there be additional protections for small traders and small businesses?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
That is fair enough. Thank you very much for that. Thank you to Mr McIntosh for the outline as well.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
That is a useful direction. Thank you very much for that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Bill Kidd
Thank you for the depth of your responses. There is general agreement—in fact, there is total agreement—that the £1,000 asset protection threshold for consumer statutory pledges is too low these days, and it is expected that that will be replaced. I think that most people are looking forward to alternatives for achieving protection for essential household goods, including, specifically, the exclusion of what are termed ordinary household goods or the creation of an index-linked accelerator to ensure that the threshold is updated. Do you have any views on the strengths or weaknesses of those approaches?