The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 841 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
I thank Lord Drummond Young for his evidence so far. Section 61 of the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Bill proposes that, once a private trust has been in existence for 25 years, it can have its trust purposes altered on application to the Court of Session.
Half of those who responded to the committee’s call for views, including the Faculty of Advocates, believe that that period is longer than necessary and that the minimum period should be shorter. Some who responded said that there should be no period at all before which a court application could be made. What are your reflections on the responses that the committee received?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
Does that mean that, although section 61 proposes 25 years before someone could apply to the Court of Session, that period would not necessarily apply?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
That is really helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
Under section 7 of the bill, trustees can remove a fellow trustee on the basis that the trustee has become incapable. Under section 12, a trustee does not get to participate in trust decisions if they are incapable or—perhaps more understandably—if they are untraceable. The possible risk of abuse of those provisions by trustees has been highlighted by some of the respondents to the call for views, such as Gillespie Macandrew LLP. Can you highlight any safeguards in the bill as it stands, or elsewhere in trust law, that would guard against that risk? Do you see some merit in the concerns?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
If you thought that that was controversial, you might think that my question is, too. Part 2 of the bill does not contain a blanket ban on an unlawful killer being an executor. As the law is not clear in this area, two academic lawyers, Dr Alisdair MacPherson and Professor Roddy Paisley of the University of Aberdeen, have suggested that part 2 of the bill be used to clarify the law in this area. The situation could be that the unlawful killer is the partner, husband or wife of the deceased and they would then become the executor of the will. That has raised a lot of concerns. What do you have to say about that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
I suppose that it is about mental incapacity.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
Under the structure of the bill as introduced, would it be possible for a trustee to challenge such a decision without reaching the stage at which it was necessary to go to court? Would the ability to challenge be built in for anyone who was dealt with in such a manner?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Bill Kidd
That makes sense. Thank you very much.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Bill Kidd
I want to re-emphasise what you stated in your report. You said:
“There was a lack of transparency and good governance around the assessment and approval of these payments.”
You also stated:
“FMPG’s Remuneration Committee membership consists of: the Chair of the Board, two Non-Exec Board members and the Turnaround Director.”
It does not do any harm to emphasise who actually gave the right for those payments to be made, because it suggests that proper oversight of what was happening in the situation was not being taken from outside.