The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 825 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Bill Kidd
But, at the moment, you believe that there is a robust and rigorous process that can handle just about anything that might emerge.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Bill Kidd
On that basis, is the Scottish Government doing, or even considering doing, anything to facilitate improved scrutiny of the financial basis of framework legislation—perhaps by helping committees to have greater scrutiny ability or by its own departments carrying that through?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Bill Kidd
That is great. Thank you very much.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Bill Kidd
Thank you. Mike Hedges can tell us whether what is happening down in Wales is similar.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Bill Kidd
It is very helpful to hear another perspective. Jonathan Jones, do you want to add anything?
10:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Bill Kidd
I thank all our witnesses for their very wide-ranging answers—I am not left with an awful lot to ask out of what I was going to ask. However, I will just take us back a wee bit. From your experience, could changes be made to the scrutiny of framework legislation to enhance the scrutiny of particular elements, such as possible savings and costs? We should be considering how much we will spend on legislation in the build-up to passing bills. Do you have any ideas on how information on costs and savings could be found?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Bill Kidd
Thank you very much. That is all extremely helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Bill Kidd
I ask Claire McGuigan to respond to my question first. It sounds a relatively straightforward question, but it is obvious from hearing everything that has been said that so much is being delivered on behalf of children and families. How does your work keep the Promise’s central aim of reducing the number of children who go into care, basically by keeping them with their families?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Bill Kidd
That is a great depth of support for the children and their families. I am really impressed by the idea of having workers who have experienced this themselves. That is really something. Does anyone want to add anything?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Bill Kidd
Thank you for the detail that you have come up with, because you have answered some of my questions. I will combine a couple of wee things, if you do not mind. Henry VIII powers allow ministers to change primary legislation by secondary legislation. Do you think that the nature of Henry VIII powers are well enough understood by stakeholders? Are those powers explained to them, or is it just assumed that they can fit in with them? From your experience of being involved in scrutiny of a bill that proposes to grant Henry VIII powers, what are your reflections on how the scrutiny process could be improved? What could make that process work better?
10:30