The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 848 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I will try to focus on some specifics. In the period in which the chief executive officer was requesting to return to work, the board’s view was that the chief executive officer should either take extended leave or otherwise be suspended. Does the decision about which of those three outcomes should happen rest entirely with the board, or does the Scottish Government have any ability to instruct or direct the board in that respect?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
I ask you to hold that thought, because I am coming to it in a moment. First, I want to tie off the earlier point. Mr Hogg, in response to my first question about the meeting on 10 September, told us that the Scottish Government expressed surprise at the decision to suspend. I just want to be absolutely clear. Prior to that, was there at any point a moment when the Scottish Government expressed a view in advance about which decision—return to work, extended leave or suspension—was correct?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
That is helpful context. I am just looking to pin down the facts on the amount of contact. Other than the correspondence mentioned in the timeline and the communication that you have just referred to, was there no other contact or dialogue between the Government and the chief executive?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Okay. If there is further detail on that, perhaps it can be provided later.
The cabinet secretary came on to the separate issue about the appointment of an interim accountable officer being a Government decision and the appointment of the chief executive being a board decision, and the usual practice being that those positions are held by the same person. That seems to be where an already messy situation has been compounded. Those decisions—not only who to appoint but whether to appoint an interim for those two separate posts—are completely separate. Am I correct to say that those two decisions are entirely separate and that one sits with the board and the other with the Government?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Yes, but, ultimately, the board was still free to say, “We’re not going to bother.”
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
You asked the board for its rationale. At any point, did the Scottish Government, either in the person of the cabinet secretary or through officials, express a view about which of those three outcomes—return to work, extended leave or suspension—should happen?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
I do not think that we should be trying to turn the situation into a political football or to score points about it. Our priority should be to ensure that, if, in future, any public body should encounter anything that is comparable with this situation, it is resolved more quickly and effectively. Should the rules change as a result of what has been learned through this unhappy experience to ensure that the gap between the appointment of a CEO and the appointment of an accountable officer is closed?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
I will end that line of questioning there, but it seems as though the provision of some kind of special measures protocol—to be used in extremis and, I would hope, very rarely—is something that the Government ought to reflect on.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
So COSLA recognises that councils are in very different circumstances and that even a general uplift in local government funding, were that to be made possible, would still not resolve the fact that there are certain councils that face extraordinary pressures on other parts of their budget, which will inevitably have an impact on areas such as culture.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
That meeting was on 10 September.