The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1652 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
What about the games sector?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I have one final question, convener.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
When I raised that specific example, I was conscious that, for example, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are members of the coalition. It is not just that there is no entity that could join to represent England as a nation but, even at city or regional level, there is no membership from within England of the coalition.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I know that the First Minister is aware of the scale of the housing crisis in Glasgow, which has been exacerbated by the United Kingdom Government’s changes to asylum policy—changes that are harming the lives of asylum seekers and are also harmful to the budgets available for public services. Will the First Minister tell us what urgent action the Scottish Government has taken, since his officials started meeting the local authority, registered social landlords and others to discuss the situation, to ensure that those parties have the resources that they need to deal with this crisis, which is not of their making?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I want to talk about the equalities impacts, which I asked the previous panel about. A moment ago, Lesley Blair talked about the number of women-led businesses in the industry and followed that by saying very firmly that safety is paramount. I would like to explore that balance a bit.
The previous panel was quite clear about the positive opportunities for people who provide such services and about wanting to ensure that there is still access to the services. It was a bit more difficult to draw out the disproportionate risks and harms that particular groups in our society might face at the moment. Do you agree in principle that a completely deregulated, free-market approach to the issue would reduce inequalities in business opportunities and might reduce inequalities in access to treatment but would massively exacerbate inequalities in relation to harm and risk? Do you agree with the Government’s position that the bill strikes the right balance in mitigating some of the negative equalities impacts? The Government’s view is that the positive equalities impacts from the bill would outweigh the negative ones.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I do not want to put words in everybody’s mouths, but it sounds as though both of the witnesses are saying that the equalities impacts of the bill lean more towards positive than negative.
One witness on the previous panel made the suggestion that, in addition, some people are having language accessibility issues in relation to the provision of available information, and one witness suggested that there could be improvements to mitigate any disproportionate risk of harm to people in that category. What are the present witnesses’ reactions to that? I will come on to the issue of age in a moment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am sorry that we cannot hear from one witness. Every witness is free to send us a written note after the meeting if there was something that you wanted to put on the record.
The Government asserts that mitigations to the potential negative impacts could be put in place. The Government’s view is that there is a positive balance between the positive and negative equalities impacts, but that there can be mitigations for the negative impacts. Will the witnesses comment on what mitigations they believe will be in place or ought to be in place to ensure that we get the maximum positive equalities impacts and the minimum negative equalities impacts?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Thank you, both.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Finally, is Consumer Scotland confident that the approach that the bill proposes will reduce the disproportionate risk for people with, for example, low levels of literacy or other barriers to understanding what services are being offered, what they are being sold and what the risks are? Will the bill reduce that potential inequality of harm or risk that is being run by certain groups in accessing services?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Thanks very much. That is all from me, convener. Do you want to check one last time if Tina McCaffery’s audio has been sorted out?