Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1646 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

ADHD and Autism Pathways and Support

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

Okay. I beg your pardon.

I wish to move on to discuss the role of the private sector—and a few other members have questions on this theme, too. There are quite a few dimensions to discuss. We have heard concerns from some of the professional bodies about quality, about whether services are being provided to a recognised and agreed standard, and about whether there is too much emphasis on single-condition assessments, which could miss other aspects of a person’s situation.

From the point of view of individuals looking to access services, we have heard about the unfairness in the fact that private sector services will often be very much available to people who are well resourced, while others cannot access them or, in some cases, find themselves going into debt in order to access them. People may also have a frustration that, even if they have accessed a private diagnosis, it does not necessarily lead to access to the treatment that they want through the NHS.

There are also concerns from the third sector’s point of view about “private” being thought of as covering everything that is non-NHS. Although the third sector may be in a position to provide services on a not-for-profit basis—which, ethically, most of us would be more comfortable with—and although third sector organisations may often work in a way that is rooted within the lived experience of people who have greater familiarity with the issues, that does not necessarily come with stable funding, which can leave organisations feeling taken advantage of in terms of what they can deliver.

Thinking about all of those aspects, what, in short, do you think should be the role of the private sector or of non-NHS provision? Do you want that to be expanded? Do you want such provision to be brought into the NHS, so that the NHS is providing for people’s needs and people do not have to resort to the private sector? Where should things be going?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

ADHD and Autism Pathways and Support

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

I am not seeking to take away from the value and importance of that at all. However, we have heard a significant number of voices say that diagnosis is hugely important for a range of reasons, including access to prescription medication in certain circumstances. I am not yet hearing from the Government how it intends to meet what you, yourself, are describing as a substantial demand that is currently unmet.

09:45  

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

ADHD and Autism Pathways and Support

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

—in meeting the need for diagnosis and treatment, as opposed to wider support?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

ADHD and Autism Pathways and Support

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

I know that other members want to come in on this theme. My last question is this: by what time—what date—do you think that moving to the different model that you have described is going to make a substantial difference to people who are currently left waiting or feeling forced to go to private providers if they have the money to do so?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

International Development

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

To be meaningful, international development must be rooted in climate justice, as I think that the First Minister recognises. One key ask from Scotland’s International Development Alliance is for the Scottish Government to endorse a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty. By doing so, it would be joining 143 city, local and subnational governments around the world, including Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils. Will the First Minister add Scotland’s national voice to that growing global call for such a treaty by formally endorsing it?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

Do you take the point, though, that having those events in the other order—making the announcement first and then being willing to come to answer questions about the real, serious impact of the decision—might have built a little more trust?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

You are going to get one next year though, aren’t you?

10:15  

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

There is the world cup, which you know will be busy.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

It is one that is worth taking some time over, I think.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Patrick Harvie

You have directly anticipated my final question, which is about the process from here on. A four-week consultation would mean that a decision would be made before there was the opportunity not just to hear views from the workforce, viewers and the wider community but for political scrutiny here and at Westminster, where the Scottish Affairs Committee is taking an interest in the matter, too. What can be done to ensure that Ofcom slows down and gives the time that is required for proper scrutiny and for the long-term implications to sink in for viewers in the regions immediately affected and for viewers throughout the UK, given how profound the change could be?