Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 23 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3656 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

PE2034, which was lodged by Stuart Chirnside, calls on the Scottish Government to halt its proposals for highly protected marine areas—HPMAs—and to bring forward new proposals that take account of sustainable fishing methods.

We last considered the petition in October last year, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government seeking an update on its alternative plans to enhance the protection of the marine environment. We have received a response from the Scottish Government confirming that there are no plans to progress the HPMA proposals, nor is the Government looking to designate 10 per cent of Scotland’s seas as highly protected marine areas by 2026.

In response to what the petitioner might feel is validation of their submission, do colleagues have any suggestions for action? I see Mr Ewing flailing around in his seat as he seeks to contribute to our deliberation on the issue.

11:15  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you, Mr Ewing. That obviously draws on a lot of what the committee has heard. In the first instance, I think that we should set that out to the Government in the terms that Mr Ewing has suggested, and see what response we get, which would then inform how we might take forward the matter. Do members agree with that proposal?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you very much for that, Mr Golden. Are members of the committee content to proceed on that basis?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

I am outflanked by what I would call that rather tenuous link, which committee members have managed to draw together by a thread. That is fair enough. It will be some time before we consider the petition again. There might have been quicker routes to try to establish all that. However, is that the will of colleagues, including you, Mr Choudhury? That appears to be the case. Thank you. In that case, we will keep the petition open and we will seek to clarify that point.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

I am not sure whether people connected with the petition are in the public gallery, but I hope that they are content with our keeping the petition open and proceeding on that basis.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

A9 Dualling Project

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

I should say that I am not sure that Mr Yousaf was the lead minister for the project at any point—I think that it was Keith Brown.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

A9 Dualling Project

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

And then Michael Matheson.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

A9 Dualling Project

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

The other ask of the petition that we are considering is whether a memorial to those whose lives have been lost would be appropriate. Transport Scotland was slightly concerned about that proposal and looked at it rather literally as a memorial more or less in the central reservation with people driving past, which I do not think was the suggestion. Your predecessor pointed to the memorial that was built at Queensferry for the people who died during the construction of the Forth rail bridge many years before.

Given the loss of life, is such a memorial appropriate? I do not remember anything similar in Mr Salmond’s time. Both of us have been involved in politics long enough to remember national tragedies such as the Lockerbie bombing or the Piper Alpha disaster in which there was a considerable loss of life and for which there is a memorial that people can go to. What would your thoughts have been if, as the First Minister, you had received such a suggestion? If there is merit in it, what process would evaluate that best and potentially take it to a conclusion?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Would colleagues be content with that?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 May 2024

Jackson Carlaw

The petition has been a very important one. We have discussed it on a number of occasions, although, sadly, without achieving the progress that we would wish for. However, we will set out the committee’s view, which has very much been in support of the petitioner, to the Scottish Government and seek additional information in relation to the comparative work in England and Wales.