Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 7 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3582 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

As there are no other suggestions from colleagues, are we content to proceed on that basis?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

We will keep the petition open, and we will proceed to make that further inquiry.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

As there are no other suggestions, are colleagues content with that approach?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

We will keep the petition open and act on Mr Choudhury’s suggestions.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Our next continued petition, PE1990, from Jordan Anderson, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to request the introduction of a monthly chamber session to allow young people to put questions to the First Minister and, as was the case at the time that the petition was originally lodged, “her” Cabinet. Of course, that is now “his” Cabinet.

We last considered the petition on 25 October 2023, when we agreed to write to a number of stakeholders and the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, of which I should declare that I am a member. We have received a response from the National Union of Students Scotland, which states that it has no position on the petition and that it aligns itself with the views of the Scottish Youth Parliament.

The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s response confirms that it has not had representations from the Scottish Youth Parliament to request more sittings in the Scottish Parliament building. The response highlights that a new annual exhibition slot has been added to the terms of its partnership agreement with the Scottish Youth Parliament. The next sitting of the Scottish Youth Parliament is due to take place in the Scottish Parliament on 31 October and 1 November 2024.

In the light of that, do colleagues have any comments or suggestions for action?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Mr Golden points to our inquiry on deliberative democracy. That was one of the issues that we pursued, and it had attractions, but it also had the very difficulties that Mr Golden has identified.

Are colleagues content to close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Marie McNair, are you content that we pursue the matter a bit further?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you very much. We will keep the petition open. Having been directed to the view that local authorities have that ability, let us try to find out whether staff can, in fact, access that opportunity in practice.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

That brings us to PE2048, from James Anthony Bundy. I see that Mr Bundy is with us in the gallery, along with his mother, I believe. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to increase awareness of the symptoms of stroke by reviewing its promotion of the FAST—face, arms, speech, time—stroke awareness campaign and ensuring that awareness campaigns include all the symptoms of a potential stroke.

We have been joined in our consideration of the petition by our MSP colleagues Stephen Kerr and Alexander Stewart. Good morning to you both.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 October 2024

Jackson Carlaw

The next continued petition, PE2049, from Gilliane Petrie, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce buffer zones outside migrant accommodation to prevent anti-migrant groups from gathering in those spaces and help to protect occupants, including asylum seekers and refugees, from harassment and intimidation. We also considered the petition at our meeting on 6 December 2023, when we agreed to seek information from the Scottish Refugee Council, JustRight Scotland, COSLA, Police Scotland, and the Mears Group.

In its response, Police Scotland states that it considers current police powers as sufficient to address any unlawful behaviour that may arise in the vicinity of migrant accommodation as a result of protest activity.

The Mears Group believes that any decision about buffer zones would be a matter for the Home Office as the contracting authority for migrant accommodation, while also highlighting its use of private security teams to help manage protests, with support from the police.

The response from JustRight Scotland states its position that the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly are fundamental rights and that lawful interference should be kept to a minimum and done cautiously. It also believes there is much more that can be done in Scotland to ensure that those seeking asylum are safe and secure in the place where they are living and in the community, with the response highlighting wider concerns about the use of institutionalised accommodation for people seeking asylum.

In light of the responses that we have received, do members have any comments or suggestions for action?