The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4175 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I will start by congratulating Murdo Fraser on the comprehensive programme of defence industries that he identified in his speech.
I also congratulate Daniel Johnson, Paul Sweeney, Edward Mountain and Jackie Baillie on what I thought were first-class, direct speeches that spoke to the very heart of the issue of the defence of this country.
I also pay tribute to the hero of this afternoon’s proceedings, Angus Robertson, who was, in fact, the only member of the Government who was prepared to sit beside the Deputy First Minister. I watched Fiona Hyslop come in, note that the Deputy First Minister was sitting on her own, unsupported, on the front bench, and bravely sit in the row behind her.
I am reminded of when it used to be that the slogan of the Scottish Government was “Stronger for Scotland”. Well, the last time that it was stronger for Scotland’s defences was when Derek Mackay sat on the front bench as its financial spokesman and actively campaigned on behalf of Thales in Govan for the ground-support vehicles that were needed to be manufactured here in Scotland, and, no doubt, deployed in the defence of this country.
The Scottish Government could take the advice of someone such as Stewart McDonald, who sat with Mr Robertson at the Palace of Westminster, where he spoke knowledgeably on defence matters, and who is now clearly at war with his own back-bench friends here in the Scottish Parliament. However, instead of his advice, the Scottish Government is now taking the advice of the Scottish Greens.
Here is the nub of the issue, as far as I am concerned: how can the Scottish Government contemplate advice from the Greens, who, when we had a reception in Parliament during apprenticeship week for more than 100 16-year-olds working in a whole diverse section of the defence industries in this country, had Ross Greer on a megaphone outside this Parliament condemning them and egging on those who were pushing, shoving and spitting at them and accusing them of committing genocide? How is that supportable?
Let us face it—the Scottish Greens are against Britain’s defence industries. They have accused Britain of committing war crimes. Ross Greer has talked about the war crimes of Churchill. The Greens talk about the war crimes of the UK Government, all the way through to the present Government. They talk about the need to be transparent, but in order to be transparent, it is necessary to be free, and in order to be free, it is necessary to have strong defences that allow us to defend our own country.
Fifty years after a politician said that one’s first duty to freedom is to defend one’s own and acquired the sobriquet of the “Iron Lady” for her trouble, Lorna Slater looks to Kate Forbes and tells her that, instead, she should stand before our enemies and posture as the organic food lady. What possible defence of our country would that represent?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I will, since Ms Slater was gracious enough to give way—eventually.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Will Lorna Slater take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I have heard Scottish Green politicians say that the United Kingdom itself commits war crimes. Is it the Scottish Greens’ position that the United Kingdom Government should not be supplying weapons to itself?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We have to be careful, as that involves an active case. We cannot really discuss it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
No problem. Thank you very much.
Paul Sweeney has been much concerned with the petition’s progress, and he has been with us online this morning. I will use my discretion to invite him in and see whether he would like to put any questions to you.
Welcome, Mr Sweeney—the floor is yours.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
There we are. Thank you, Mr Sweeney. Your contribution and some of the others that we have heard along the way perhaps play into what I might pose as the final question.
The Scottish Government has committed to updating guidance on how local authorities deal with dangerous listed buildings, including undertaking research to inform that work. Is there any point that you might want to volunteer in conclusion, additional to anything that we have discussed, that you would like to see reflected or included in that fresh guidance?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you all very much for what has been a very interesting conversation. We have had the opportunity to consider the petition on a number of occasions, and it does come to mind sometimes in the period between our considerations. When a building that is under threat materialises in the national infrastructural consciousness, one immediately thinks of the provisions that we have been discussing.
We will consider the evidence that we have heard at a future date, and thank you all for your participation. I suspend the meeting briefly.
10:32 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Can we incorporate the suggestions made in the ALACHO dispatch in our submission to the minister? Are we agreed?