The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4573 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
We will carry on the petition at our convenience.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1962, which was lodged by Lynn and Darren Redfern, is on stopping motorhomes parking overnight outwith formal campsites, caravan parks and aires. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to improve licensing enforcement on motorhomes to ensure that they park only in designated and regulated locations.
Lynn and Darren explain that motorhomes place an unnecessary burden on local communities when they park outwith formal spaces, with the disposal of rubbish, chemical toilets and dirty water. The Scottish Government has responded to the petition highlighting the rural tourism infrastructure fund, which has helped with the provision of facilities and with addressing issues of irresponsible waste disposal. It also highlights newly revised NatureScot guidance for land managers on off-road parking and positive awareness-raising work by the visitor management group.
The Scottish Government states that it believes that the current response to the increasing use of motorhomes is “sufficient”, and points to feedback that
“campervans have been managed better in 2022 than in previous years”.
Therefore, it does not believe that
“introducing a formal requirement to use specific sites”
would address
“the challenges outlined in the petition.”
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action on the petition?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to the end of the meeting. Thank you all very much. We will meet again on 7 December.
Meeting closed at 12:10.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
You are just here to speak to the petition. Do colleagues have any recommendations for how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I would certainly be willing for the committee to try to tease out an explanation. Transport for London deals with tens of millions of people using the system. The Glasgow pilot is referred to as being useful but not necessarily cost-effective on a commercial basis, which may reflect the numbers involved in relation to the cost of setting it up. I do not know. Any citizen of Glasgow who travels abroad is surprised at how far behind the smart technology is in the largest city in Scotland. There is more that we could tease out in relation to that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
It strikes me as peculiar that we have introduced barrier technology at a series of stations but that we cannot programme the barriers to be pay as you go. I would not have thought that that was impossible.
Who should we try to pursue these issues with? Meanwhile, we should write to the Scottish Government to clarify whether Scottish Rail Holdings Ltd is covered by the consumer duty legislation. If it considers that SRHL is not covered, we should ask what action it proposes to take to ensure that it is. It would be a deficiency if it is not.
I was also struck by what Mr Eckton said in his latest submission about how easy it is to miss the advertising on fares. We should ask SRHL about the action that it is taking to ensure that people can easily identify that. I would be very interested to know what advertising it does and how it evaluates whether that advertising has been successful.
Are there any other thoughts or comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That is a perfectly fair observation. The actions that we have discussed can be linked back to the actual aim of the petition, but I agree that we have to be careful. Although I welcomed everything that Monica Lennon had to contribute, it invited us to stray slightly beyond, in a number of areas, the specific ambition of the petition.
We are always willing to receive an additional petition from another party on all those other matters. If we opened up an inquiry in the broadest possible terms in relation to every petition, we would—to extend your metaphor, Mr Ewing—be trawling very deeply.
Are members content to proceed on the basis of the various recommendations that we have had?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
We can see if that works. Ultimately, the project would have to be taken forward by others, but I take the point that it would have to include a much wider range of views to be certain that it was viable, in addition to any capping proposal that might proceed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Quite a bit of the evidence that we have heard was not so much about the ambition around the delivery of various principles. Alexander Stewart will ask a couple of questions in relation to that.
I go back to the medication-assisted treatment standards and the importance that you attach to their being embedded—I refer back to that word. To what extent did the work that you did suggest how far adrift we were from the delivery of that principle?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you.
10:30