The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I think that we could combine your recommendation with the closure of the petition. We can write to make that suggestion. Are you content with that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
The next continued petition is PE1901, on replacing the voting system for the Scottish Parliament with a more proportional alternative. The petition, lodged by Richard Wood, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to replace the broadly proportional additional member system that is used for electing MSPs with a more proportional alternative.
In our previous consideration of the petition, we agreed to write to the Electoral Commission, which has responded that it holds “no view” on the issue.
By way of reminder, the petition states that the additional member system is “not fully proportional”. The Scottish Government has indicated that it has no ambition to review the system at the present time.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I interrupted you, but thank you for that helpful clarification.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1893, on introducing legislation to protect Scotland’s war memorials, was lodged by James Watson on behalf of the friends of Dennistoun war memorial. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce legislation that recognises desecration or vandalism of war memorials as a specific criminal offence.
At our most recent consideration of the petition, the committee agreed to write to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission. We have received a detailed submission from the commission, which concludes by making clear that it does not believe that it has the authority to consider action in respect of the petition, because that would fall outside its scope, given the war memorials that are directly within its responsibility.
Members might recall that the Scottish Government said in its submission that it is content that
“there is legislation currently in place to deal with the vandalism and desecration of statutes and memorials, including war memorials ... Scottish Government has no current plans to introduce new legislation for the specific purpose requested in the petition.”
Do members want to recommend a route, given what we have heard from the Commonwealth War Graves Commission and the Scottish Government?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Sweeney wants to come in and then I will invite Jackie Baillie to make a statement to the committee based on what we have heard this morning.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Your life is being rebuilt with the support of your partner, Ian, who we are very grateful to have with us this morning as well. His support has obviously been hugely important to you.
In concluding, I would like to give you an opportunity to make any additional remarks to us as a committee that will help us going forward. If you have anything that you would like to read to us by way of a statement, that will be equally valuable.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
If colleagues are content to pursue that route, I thank Mr Watson and the friends of Dennistoun war memorial. In closing the petition, perhaps we could draw their attention to the legislation that the Government thinks is appropriate, so that they know that they have recourse to it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you very much, minister and Mr Howieson. Jackie Baillie, who has supported the petitioners in the development of the petition, has been listening to proceedings. Jackie, would you like to make a statement that the committee can consider along with the evidence that we have heard this morning?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Ms Baillie. I do not think that it would be quite right for members of the Parliament who are not members of the committee to cross-examine the minister, but, if the minister would like to say anything to the committee before we draw the session to a conclusion, we would be very pleased to hear that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That is interesting. If the Scottish Government will not expand the remit of its inquiry or, as has been suggested, if a separate inquiry were not to take place, is it possible that some of the themes, lessons and recommendations that emerge through that inquiry in England and Wales could crystallise into actions that campaigners could pursue more directly with the Scottish Government here? In other words, is it possible that that inquiry will lead to recommendations of which Scotland should be taking note, too?