The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4175 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I will—in a second.
It was even worse in my west of Scotland region, where my Eastwood seat is, because, there, Mr Greer—who disports himself quite obviously as the self-ordained minister in waiting—was rejected by 92.9 per cent of the people of Scotland. What mandate does that man have to stand up and boast that he is imposing Green policy on the people of Scotland?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
If the Deputy First Minister checks the voting record, I think that he will find that the Liberal Democrats had something like 25 per cent of the vote when that coalition was formed.
However, as we saw from the Supreme Court, there is a route for negotiation with the House of Commons or, in the meantime, to accept the responsibility of this Parliament.
Between 2011 and 2016, when I was Conservative spokesperson for health, I agreed to an offer to take the national health service off the football pitch, in an effort to work together to find a consensus around how we might proceed. As Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing, Alex Neil even convened meetings between all the parties, but all of that was set aside when the 2015 election came about.
If the health service is struggling in England under the Conservatives, in Wales under the Labour Party and in Scotland under the SNP, by what conceit does any one party think that it can say, “We and we alone can now offer a solution to the crisis that is evolving on health.”? Would it not be far better to listen to people such as Wes Streeting, on whom I read with interest an article at the weekend? He talked about having a working partnership with the private sector and a new model for GP primary care.
Would it not be far better to listen to those people who have talked about reopening the Nightingale wards as places where early discharge patients could go in order to free up space in our NHS, or to GPs such as our own Sandesh Gulhane? Would it not be far better for us to work in concert to seek a solution, rather than individually firing forward ideas that everyone else shoots down? The NHS carries on and workers do so in despair, but there is no political solution whatsoever.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Is not it the case that the licence is afforded as a method of pest control and is completely unworkable for large birds such as eagles because of the risk of serious injury to the birds?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Minister—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I did not repeat the question. You indicated that the licence was an adequate method of control, but it clearly is not.
The petitioner made the point that, if everybody with a bird of prey—a falcon—let it loose every day during the open season, and every day it took a hare, it would take 50 years for those birds of prey to take as many hares as are shot in one year. Are birds of prey seriously a threat to conservation of the mountain hare?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, but you commented a moment ago that the birds could legitimately hunt other prey, just not mountain hare. Is the eagle supposed to have some sort of education about which of the animals on the ground it is allowed to hunt?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Okay. If it is 1 per cent, that is 1,000, perhaps, taken by birds of prey each year, and 26,000 to 38,000—at the absolute maximum, 50,000—are shot each year. Is the legislation proportionate in terms of the impact that it has had on those who fly birds of prey?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Is that for birds of prey or shooting?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
It is a reflection of the fact that the birds have not flown for two years.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content with that suggestion?