The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1850 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
I accept the point about the validity of referenda. I am merely making the point that they work best when we are talking about changing the rules of the game through some major constitutional change.
The public rightly hold us to account at elections. Constitutional questions aside, that is how representative democracy should work, so, respectfully, I cannot support Mr McMillan’s amendment 112.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
I thank Jeremy Balfour for his generosity in taking interventions.
I hope that the concerns that Ms Forbes has raised might be addressed in some of the amendments that we are discussing today, not least Mr Johnson’s amendments.
I return to the question that Mr Hepburn asked about why your amendment 243 contains a phrase about stopping the conversation instantly. Why would that be helpful?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
I just wonder whether the member is bearing in mind, at the moment, that there are many, many people on both sides of this debate who care deeply about it, who are following these proceedings and who are wondering what the last half hour has been about. Does he not think that, given that some of this, such as the reservation of the regulation of medical professions, was in the Scotland Act 1998, all of this outrage is false outrage? We should get back to talking about amendments, and get back to talking about the bill that people are interested in.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
I will speak to my amendments 176, 179 and 188.
Normally, members hear me urging the NHS to do more of its work online to avoid unnecessary and gruelling travel for patients in the Highlands and Islands, so I appreciate the points that have been made by Mr McArthur, who makes the same case regularly.
However, I believe that the matter that we are discussing today is in a different category. Whatever members’ views on the bill’s merits might be, I hope that we can agree that a person should not be put in a position where they have to make, via Zoom, a decision about ending their life.
On the point that was alluded to, about allowing for flexibility, I ask members to forgive me if I am ignorant in this regard, but I honestly cannot see circumstances in which a doctor should not make the effort to visit such a patient. I have doubts about whether the bill would allow enough time for proper face-to-face consultations, particularly for the first and second declarations that are set out in it.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
I do not think that there should be fewer protections in rural areas than there would be in urban areas. It seems to me that there should be a pretty basic obligation on doctors to visit patients in such circumstances and that that should apply throughout the country.
At present, the bill seems to assume that consultations could be done remotely—or, at least, it does not rule out that possibility. Identifying coercion over video must be extremely difficult—I would judge it to be impossible—because professionals cannot reliably see the subtle cues, hesitations or dynamics that indicate that someone is under pressure. That is not a theoretical concern. In a remote meeting, it is not even necessarily apparent to all participants who else is in the room or what is being said off camera, as Mr Greer pointed out. To be frank, regardless of whether a patient is in a city or on an island, the professionals involved—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
I fully agree. Anyone who has attempted to ask a question in a hybrid meeting will be able to readily identify with what Daniel Johnson has said.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
Will the member give way?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
That is my understanding of the way in which the amendments have been written.
In my view, my amendments would at least ensure that the crucial decisions would be made with everyone in the same actual, rather than virtual, room. Therefore, I ask members to back my three amendments in the group.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
As you will appreciate, this long-running petition is of great interest to my constituents. You mentioned the national goose forum and the delivery plan, and you mentioned the need for swiftness. The Scottish Government has recognised the problem that exists in some parts of the country with recent funding, not least that relating to Uist. Do you think that, going forward, there needs to be a swifter reaction to extreme situations with some species in some locations?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Alasdair Allan
Finally, when you look at solutions to arrive at what might be considered sustainable numbers of greylag geese in some locations, is the only alternative that you are looking at the shooting of geese and the finding of shooters? If not, what alternatives are you open to looking at in the future?