Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 26 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 918 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

The amendment talks about consulting

“such persons as the Scottish Ministers consider may have an interest in, or otherwise be affected by, the regulations”.

Obviously, it would be up to the Government to interpret that, but I think that the scope is pretty broad. It would have to be somebody either interested in or “affected by” the matter in hand.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

Do you want to intervene on me? [Laughter.]

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

I will speak to my amendments 113 and 114. New section 2F of the 2004 act, introduced by section 1(3) of the bill, sets out the process for setting or amending targets. I am aware that the committee has an interest in those targets, and its stage 1 report highlights recommendations for improvements to be made regarding the need

“to consult and have regard to expertise from specific sectors of the economy with a key role in delivering biodiversity targets.”

I thought that those points were important enough to address, and that it was crucial that the provisions in this section include a consultation requirement. Accordingly, my two amendments seek to address those issues.

My amendment 113 would add a requirement for the Scottish ministers to consult any persons interested in or impacted by the targets before laying regulations that set, amend or remove statutory targets. My amendment 114 would ensure that any pre-commencement consultation can count towards fulfilling that requirement. I believe that my amendments would strengthen transparency and stakeholder engagement in developing biodiversity targets. They reflect the need to consult sectors that are critical to biodiversity delivery, and to build on the expertise and independent advice that is being sought for biodiversity targets. For all those reasons, I will move the amendments.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

As we are not in the chamber, this is not a rhetorical question but a genuine one. Could you explain a wee bit about how your amendments interact with things such as the Electricity Act 1989 and other reserved areas? Do they interact in any way?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

I was asking—and it is not a rhetorical question—whether you could say a bit more about how or whether your amendments impact in any way on reserved areas such as the Electricity Act 1989.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

The measures in the bill that seek to avoid the accidental situation of deemed crofts or grazings shares that are separated from crofts will be welcome. I am trying to get a picture in my head of a potential scenario in a township where several crofts could end up without any shares in common grazings. What would the Government’s view be on that, and what would that mean for any new entrant who did want to keep livestock in the village?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

Would they be able to graze livestock if, hypothetically, half the available crofts in a village had become separated from the shares in the common grazings?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

You mentioned co-operation with other organisations such as RPID. That has come up in evidence. The issue is related, as it is about enforcement. Can you say a bit more about how that will work? In giving evidence to the committee, directly or indirectly, a number of stakeholders have been looking for RPID and the Crofting Commission to work together more closely to gather evidence about activity or inactivity.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

That is helpful. You said that only 25 per cent of crofters have livestock. Although I appreciate that there has been a big decline in the amount of livestock that is kept, does the figure take into account things such as subtenancies, grazing agreements or, indeed, abandoned crofts?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Alasdair Allan

I am talking about people who own a share in a grazing but who do not have a croft in that community.