The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1741 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
We are a bit pressed for time, so I will move on to my other question. It is interesting that you talk about flexibility in the fund, because the figures that we have from Crisis show that the national cost of mitigation of the bedroom tax has doubled from £35 million to something like £72 million in 10 years.
Why are we seeing an increase in the cost of that mitigation? You would think that the number of tenancies involved would remain stable from when it was first introduced. Is there an argument that, as Crisis says in its paper, more could be done to move people out of properties or to make it more attractive for them to move out, to free up some bigger properties? That would give more money to that pot for flexibility.
10:15Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
I ask Les Robertson the same question. I know that Fife has invested in care villages and smaller properties that are aimed at the older population. What other challenges have you seen in relation to the bedroom tax and how much it takes from the available pot? Has there been an increase, over 10 years, in the amount of money that it takes?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
Thank you for that clarity. I assume that you agree, however, that the numbers in temporary accommodation are increasing because we do not have enough social housing to put them in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
In 2024, the rate was unfrozen and recalculated to 30 per cent. I think that that cost £1.3 billion—is that right?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
The previous witnesses also talked about the Scottish Government’s approach to private lets, whether there needs to be more clarity about their importance and whether they are part of the answer to social housing and homelessness pressures. They felt that there was a lack of clarity from the Government about how it sees private rents. Do you agree that there is not a clear message about the expectation on the private sector in relation to Scotland’s housing issues?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
Does that mean that the number of people who experience the gap might be smaller but that the gap is larger?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
Ashley Campbell, do you want to come in?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
I will leave it there, convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
First, I have some questions about the proportion of overall funding that goes to DHP. The Crisis submission says that
“Bedroom tax mitigation is demand-led and has ... doubled in the past 10 years”;
it started off at £35 million a year and is now at £72 million a year. How has that happened? I would have thought that the amount of tenancies in that situation would have remained stable, so are we talking about increases in rent or more people finding themselves in that situation? Why has it increased that much?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
The City of Edinburgh Council’s written submission talks about the high rents that you are experiencing and the difficulty of bridging that gap. The broad market rental area—BRMA—in Edinburgh is calculated within Lothian, whereas the BRMA in Glasgow is calculated within greater Glasgow. Would you support a review of the boundaries of the geographical areas? That would lead to winners and losers, so is that the way to resolve the issue? Rents in Edinburgh are being compared with rents in Midlothian and other areas.