Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 23 September 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 9 contributions

|

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

Nicole, I anticipate that your answer will be largely the same as Nick Halfhide’s, but perhaps you could add into your response comments on what you will do to prevent staff from leaving. Often, when an organisation faces such a level of change, some staff start to think that they do not want to be there and look for an alternative.

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

Mr McGuigan, the biggest cost in any organisation is staff, so when you make changes of this sort there is a money-saving process. Although a no compulsory redundancies policy is in place, surely part of this is about reducing head count. That is how organisations such as the one that has been announced save money.

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

Part of the issue of water resilience is scarcity. There has been quite a lot of discussion around AI data centres over the summer, and there is a members’ business debate on that subject today in the Parliament. Scottish Water has a key role to play in what will happen if we go ahead with establishing those data centres. It is a big issue for constituents, who want to know how much water each data centre is going to use. I know that, with regard to the project in Fife, Scottish Water has given assurances that the water levels are fine, but I do not think that people are really convinced, given the scale of that project.

Where does the policy around data centres fit into your planning around water scarcity? What considerations and thoughts have been given to working out what the establishment of such centres would mean for Scotland’s water supply?

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

But, at the moment, the Government seems to be suggesting that the timescale will be the same as it was the last time and that it will be presenting the plan quite late again—that is, towards dissolution. However, you have said that the reasons for the delay the last time do not apply this time, so it could be argued—

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

In 2023, Audit Scotland looked at the Scottish Government’s climate change goals and it commented on the CCP. Do you have any reflections on how we track progress? I know that your work is about following the public pound.

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

Dr Dixon, you have, very helpfully, covered quite a few of the areas that I was going to ask about with regard to the climate change plan, and you have set out some of the things that we should be paying attention to. However, I think that you said that there are no interim targets. If that is the case, how can we monitor progress? I note from our papers that you said that you had found that the

“lack of interim”

targets

“could result in actions going off track”

and that we would not be able to find them. Indeed, you said in your initial remarks that it is not clear what each policy is meant to deliver by when. Therefore, how do we, as a committee, scrutinise progress?

There is also the question of when the climate change plan gets published and the lack of opportunity for parliamentary scrutiny. As you have pointed out, in the letter that we have had back from the cabinet secretary, she says that she has met the statutory obligations, but that still leaves the problem of a lack of scrutiny. Is it possible to change that? This probably shows my lack of knowledge of the area, but does the Government have to take all that time before it introduces the plan, or could it shorten that time and thereby give Parliament more time to engage with it?

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

I am sure that the committee will consider the single agency proposal in detail over the next while, but I have some initial questions for the three organisations that are involved. What is your redundancy policy? What discussions, if any, took place prior to the announcement being made? Have you estimated what resources will be required to deliver change? Does the proposal have an impact on your planned budgets? Finally, what is the timescale? NatureScot’s press release suggested that it would be 2029, but has that been confirmed?

If you do not know the answer to those questions, when do you expect that you will know? What discussions are taking place with Government about how the process will be carried out?

The questions are for Nick Halfhide, Nicole Paterson and Ciaran McGuigan.

Climate Action Committee [Draft]

Climate Action

Meeting date: 3 September 2026

Claire Baker

How does the announcement disrupt that? We can see from the papers the amount of work that you have done on public service reform within the organisation. You have been on a particular path, and then this proposal comes along. How do you continue on that path? How does that fit with the announcement?

Climate Action Committee

Interests

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Claire Baker

I do not have any relevant interests to declare.