The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 52 contributions
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2026
Claire Baker
I have a couple of questions on the net zero assessment. It is my understanding that it is applied to policy proposals. Mr Black puts quite a lot of faith in the net zero assessments and is looking for granularity in those figures. A response from the Scottish Government to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee said that the net zero information on policy proposals would not be shared directly; it would be shared only at the point that they became taxonomy. I am trying to explain this and I hope that it is making sense. It suggested that the information from the net zero assessment of policy proposals would not be available; it would not be transparent. It would become available only once it moved back into taxonomy, when it would then be judged as being either a positive or a negative spend. Have I understood the approach properly, and do you think that that is the right way to approach the net zero assessments?
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2026
Claire Baker
I have a question to get some clarity about the cumulative approach. Road building has been used as an example. Would that approach mean that, although individual projects might not meet the threshold, a group of projects collected together would meet the threshold because of their emissions? Is that the principle? Is that what “cumulative” means?
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2026
Claire Baker
There is a recommendation that the NZA should include whole-life emissions, which include national and international emissions rather than just territorial ones. Will you explain that a bit more?
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
I am sure that the committee will consider the single agency proposal in detail over the next while, but I have some initial questions for the three organisations that are involved. What is your redundancy policy? What discussions, if any, took place prior to the announcement being made? Have you estimated what resources will be required to deliver change? Does the proposal have an impact on your planned budgets? Finally, what is the timescale? NatureScot’s press release suggested that it would be 2029, but has that been confirmed?
If you do not know the answer to those questions, when do you expect that you will know? What discussions are taking place with Government about how the process will be carried out?
The questions are for Nick Halfhide, Nicole Paterson and Ciaran McGuigan.
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
How does the announcement disrupt that? We can see from the papers the amount of work that you have done on public service reform within the organisation. You have been on a particular path, and then this proposal comes along. How do you continue on that path? How does that fit with the announcement?
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
Nicole, I anticipate that your answer will be largely the same as Nick Halfhide’s, but perhaps you could add into your response comments on what you will do to prevent staff from leaving. Often, when an organisation faces such a level of change, some staff start to think that they do not want to be there and look for an alternative.
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
Mr McGuigan, the biggest cost in any organisation is staff, so when you make changes of this sort there is a money-saving process. Although a no compulsory redundancies policy is in place, surely part of this is about reducing head count. That is how organisations such as the one that has been announced save money.
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
Part of the issue of water resilience is scarcity. There has been quite a lot of discussion around AI data centres over the summer, and there is a members’ business debate on that subject today in the Parliament. Scottish Water has a key role to play in what will happen if we go ahead with establishing those data centres. It is a big issue for constituents, who want to know how much water each data centre is going to use. I know that, with regard to the project in Fife, Scottish Water has given assurances that the water levels are fine, but I do not think that people are really convinced, given the scale of that project.
Where does the policy around data centres fit into your planning around water scarcity? What considerations and thoughts have been given to working out what the establishment of such centres would mean for Scotland’s water supply?
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
But, at the moment, the Government seems to be suggesting that the timescale will be the same as it was the last time and that it will be presenting the plan quite late again—that is, towards dissolution. However, you have said that the reasons for the delay the last time do not apply this time, so it could be argued—
Climate Action Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Claire Baker
In 2023, Audit Scotland looked at the Scottish Government’s climate change goals and it commented on the CCP. Do you have any reflections on how we track progress? I know that your work is about following the public pound.