The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1741 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
I just want to clarify what I said earlier. As I said, the maximum subsidy that councils can receive is set at 90 per cent of LHA rates, but the rates that are used are those from 2011, as Sheila Haig said, and average rents have increased by 60 per cent since then. I recognise that councils are carrying the rising cost of temporary accommodation.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
The paper says that the estimated cost of unfreezing was £2.4 billion or £2.5 billion, or something like that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
That is great.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
I have a couple of points on which I seek clarification. The Crisis paper, which is helpful, says:
“42% of Scottish households face a gap between their LHA and actual rent”.
Can you confirm that figure?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
You mentioned new lets—is that data different?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
You also break down the figures by local authority. I am surprised that Glasgow’s percentage is quite small, while the percentage in places such as East Ayrshire is quite high. Can you talk me through that? I do not know whether this is correct, but under
“% of recipients where LHA (UC) does not cover rent”
you say that the figure in Glasgow is 24 per cent.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
Could efficiencies be made within the current system that would free up some resources?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
My final question concerns the calls for the 30 per cent level to be increased. When it was initially introduced, the level was 50 per cent but it has been at 30 per cent for more than 10 years. In 2024, it was unfrozen and reset at 30 per cent, and, subsequently, it has been frozen again.
There is an argument that, if it were to be increased, there could be unintended consequences. There could be behavioural changes on the part of landlords, who would increase rents. We are looking at introducing rent controls in Scotland and there is a concern that, while we are waiting for those rent controls, there is an opportunity for landlords to increase rents again so that they creep up before we get the controls. What are your thoughts on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
The witnesses here this morning have called for an increase in LHA from the 30th percentile. Could that have unintended consequences through behavioural changes? If the percentile was increased, would landlords just increase the rent? We have rent control coming in in Scotland, but not until 2028. There are some concerns that, while we wait for the rent control to be introduced to deal with the issue, landlords might push up rents. Could there be behavioural changes that would have unintended consequences and therefore increase the pressure on the sector?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Claire Baker
It is about temporary accommodation. Les Robertson said that the situation is “patently unfair”. This might not be correct, but I think that 90 per cent of the cost is paid by the DWP and local authorities pick up the rest. I am sorry—I have been trying to find the figure in my papers.
However, surely the problem is that we have increased the number of people living in temporary accommodation. For example, we now have 10,000 children in such accommodation. We have seen a spike in the number, which is due to a shortage of housing to move them to. It is the housing crisis that is creating the bulk of the temporary accommodation issue, because we cannot move people into other properties.
We heard from the previous panel that people are reluctant to move to the private sector, because they feel that there is a lack of security. They are waiting for social housing, but we are not building enough social houses to enable us to move people out of temporary accommodation. That is why local authorities are having to carry the burden of people in temporary accommodation.