The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 875 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
George Adam
I am not being cynical—well, I am cynical—but the point is that someone who has made the decision to do something will see sheriff courts as better for them than a smaller court, because they will get a bigger platform, more newspaper coverage and more people listening to what they have to say and do. If they do not fear the sentence at the other side, that is a bit of an issue. I will not labour the point, but we can discuss it as the bill progresses.
My other point is this: will those who are here today supporting your bill not be disappointed by the suggestion that, although the bill says that there is a potential 10 years’ sentence, such a sentence is unlikely to be given out?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
George Adam
I get that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
George Adam
No, but you get what I mean. I am saying that people in certain communities will be sitting there saying, “That is a disgrace. They should get the full whack here.” They will understand what the full whack would be. However, if the sentences are unrealistic, people’s impression of the act, if it becomes one, will be one of disappointment.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
George Adam
Okay.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
George Adam
That is nonsense.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
George Adam
Apart from that, the term “betterment” itself would have rang alarm bells for me. That is just me being cynical—that is my personality. I am thinking of the whole idea that £8 million was not realised in the financial year 2024, and the figure was £23.3 million in financial year 2025, when the deficit at that stage was about £30 million.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
George Adam
Did you say the principal?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
George Adam
In March 2024, he was praising everyone for their financial resilience while things were in total free fall—I know that the band played on while the Titanic sank, but I do not think that that should be the case in a university. Would you say that a lot of that culture possibly came from the senior level and the principal himself?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
George Adam
Can you give us any particular examples of that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
George Adam
Amanda Millar, did the court have a similar attitude as Mr McGeorge had with regard to the principal?