The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 774 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
George Adam
Can you understand the committee’s concern when we have heard something like that from an individual who is involved in the process? As we all know, every single public penny is to be accounted for, and the system seems extremely complicated. I know that you said that this is the starting point, but it seems to be an extremely complicated way to deliver the training that we need.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
George Adam
My question is on the SDS side of things, minister. Basically, Damien Yeates came to the committee with the narrative that SDS is doing a fantastic job and that only he can deliver. I can understand that narrative, as he feels that his organisation is under threat. I get where he is coming from. He was forthright about it, and I liked what he had to say. However, he said that Withers was just a point of view. What do you think of someone who is part of a Government organisation coming out with such a statement—that an independent review such as the one by Withers is just a point of view?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
George Adam
She couldnae wait tae tell me.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
George Adam
As you are aware, life is always black and white with me, minister, but that is just in football.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
George Adam
Hello again, minister. You have already said that you are going to retain private providers as training suppliers. One of the questions that I asked of private providers when they were here was, “What is your cut? What are you making?” The Scottish and Northern Ireland Plumbing Employers Federation answered 40 per cent. It shocked us when we heard that. Without a thought, it just came out with “a 40 per cent cut”. It was not uncomfortable with that language.
The whole point for me is that, when we are living in a world where colleges can deliver training for only 10 to 20 per cent of the running costs, and where there is also the potential of double-dipping, where a third contractor will end up dealing with it down the line, it almost starts to smell like a cosy wee cartel for some of these companies. Surely that cannae continue.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
George Adam
I was gonnae ask you about that, because I had looked at that, and, in England, it is capped at 15 per cent. Are we looking at something like that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
George Adam
I have a final question for our witnesses. Is there anything else about the bill that the committee should consider that has not been mentioned already today?
I take it that the silence means no.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
George Adam
Good morning. I will carry on from what Sarah Collins said. Those of us of a cynical persuasion—I would probably include myself as one—sometimes ask a question and know what the answer will be, but we do not expect someone to give you the answer so brutally. Last week, I was asking questions of the private providers, and I was told by Stephanie Lowe of the Scottish and Northern Ireland Plumbing Employers Federation that they take a 40 per cent cut—and she was quite comfortable with the language—from the whole thing.
The idea in the college model is that 80 or 90 per cent of the funding goes directly to the apprentice or student and the course. We were concerned by the idea that someone could blatantly come out and say, “40 per cent goes in our sky rocket and we do what we want,” because there is no transparency. It is not like a college—it cannot be subject to a freedom of information request—so there is no transparency.
I have a fair idea of what your opinion will be, Sarah, but what is your opinion on that approach compared to other ways in which we could possibly deliver the training?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
George Adam
Another concern I have with the situation—Colleges Scotland brought it up—is the idea of double dipping. A subcontractor could subcontract, which to me seems like madness. That is more of a point of view of mine rather than a question.
In closing, I have a question that I have asked everyone. Is there anything that you think should be part of the bill that you have not mentioned today or that you want to get on the record so that we can look at as time progresses?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
George Adam
Thank you very much.