The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 774 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
I want to pick up on the issue of emergency medicine, which we have not touched on much this morning. Some of the most striking evidence that the committee heard was from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, which told us that, in 2021, there were 500 excess deaths related to people accessing emergency treatment too late. That is 10 people per week dying because the ambulance does not turn up on time or because, although the ambulance turns up on time, when it gets to the hospital, it cannot get its patients out into the emergency ward in time. That was really striking.
The royal college highlighted the continuing lack of capacity in the workforce. On Friday, you announced a new national workforce strategy, and I was interested to see the comment that the royal college made to the press on that yesterday. Although it welcomed the strategy, it said that it was
“disappointed … not to have been consulted”
on it
“and by the limited mentions of Urgent and Emergency Care.”
Will you meet the royal college to discuss that and take on board its real concerns on the matter?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
Will you give us a sense of where we are now on the delays with ambulances? Clearly, there is a lot of pressure on NHS emergency wards. Are those issues still happening?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
The top line of the story in The Scotsman this morning was that fewer people than expected have come forward for vaccination. Is that correct?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
I am a patient there.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
I do not trouble it very much, to be fair.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
Okay. I will write to you again. Thank you.
On the entirely different topic of care homes, restrictions on visiting care homes have been lifted, which is very welcome. A constituent contacted me to say that she has an elderly relative in a care home in which, if a member of staff tests positive, the entire care home is locked down and residents are not allowed to leave their rooms to go into common areas. That is very distressing for residents who have already had to put up with two years of isolation, and that happens with some frequency because of the high incidence of Covid. As far as I can tell, that approach is not set out in Government regulations, but it would be helpful if you could confirm that and say whether any advice is being offered to care home operators on such issues.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
I did write to you, Mr Swinney, and I got your reply last month. You gave me two pages of very general advice. However, that did not address the specific issue that that man’s GP has told him not to get a booster at the same time that the NHS, without asking to look at his medical records, has told him, “Sorry, you are not eligible for an exemption.” I am slightly confused about how somebody can reach that conclusion about his personal circumstances without liaising with his GP.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
I have a specific follow-up question that arises from the case of one of my constituents who had quite a serious adverse reaction to the second dose of the vaccine. I know that that is rare, but it does happen. He then went to his GP, who advised him not to get the booster. His concern was that, if he was required at some point in the future to provide certification of full vaccination status, he would need to get an exemption. He then applied for an exemption, but he was told that he was not eligible. However, nobody spoke to his GP and nobody asked to see his medical records. He is now in limbo, because his GP has told him that he should not get a booster, but he is not entitled to an exemption. Where does he go from here?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
Some of the statistics that you have given us are stark and, as a gentleman of a certain age, I am in that category of those who have missed their bowel-cancer screening. I therefore recognise what a problem this is.
In your submission, Dr Perez-Reche, you are a bit more definitive than citing just anecdotal evidence; indeed, you are quite clear that there is evidence of patients presenting with more acute conditions. What have you found?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. It is fair to say that concerns have been raised with us about the proposed change. The Scottish Association of Social Work, for example, has said that witnessing the signature of a named person provides an opportunity
“to verify the named person ... inform them of the role, allow them to ask any questions, ensure they”
understand
“the responsibilities and to confirm that they are competent and able to perform the functions correctly. This is particularly important since there is little guidance around the role and responsibilities of a named person.”
What is your response to those comments? Do you have any concerns that removing such a requirement will mean that people taking on the responsibility of being a named person will not be fully advised of what the role involves? Perhaps Dr Chopra can respond first.