The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 903 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is very helpful. Thank you.
One issue that I explored with Scottish Enterprise was the complexity of supply chains. A lot of international exports are sourced from a variety of companies. I outlined the scenario for Leonardo, which is that some of its output might end up in Israel. Would the munitions policy also apply to subcontractors, such as companies that supply components or provide training facilities to staff? Would they also be impacted by the policy?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Murdo Fraser
I asked that question because we were told by Willie Watt from SNIB that the bank had made the investment because it promoted biodiversity and there would be a higher percentage of non-commercial woodland on that site. Information that I have been given since then by our former colleague Andy Wightman suggests that that might not be the case, but perhaps the committee can follow that up directly with SNIB.
My last question is about the visitor levy, which is directly in your portfolio. The committee took evidence on that three weeks ago. There was a bit of to-ing and fro-ing, which you are very familiar with, in correspondence between the committee and Ivan McKee last week, and what was said was then contradicted. Can you tell us exactly where the Scottish Government is now in relation to potential changes to the visitor levy to allow councils the freedom to introduce a flat charge as opposed to a percentage charge?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Murdo Fraser
I believe that amendments were lodged to the Housing (Scotland) Bill that the Presiding Officer decided were not in scope—
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have one more question on this subject. From today, businesses in Edinburgh have to charge the visitor levy for bookings into next year. An Edinburgh colleague of mine has passed to me a communication that they got from constituents who run a caravan park in the Lothians, who take their bookings through Booking.com. They have just been told by Booking.com that, although it can institute the visitor levy on top of bookings that are made, it cannot deal with the visitor levy being capped at five consecutive nights. If somebody books for seven or 14 nights, say, Booking.com has to apply the visitor levy on the total sum. It suggests that the business should then refund the balance to its guests on their departure. That is a bit of a boorach, is it not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. Looking at your accounts, I see that, since your launch, you have made £785 million in investments, with an unrealised loss of £76.9 million—or 10 per cent, more or less—also reported. I entirely appreciate that, in the business that you are in, there will be losses, but is 10 per cent a reasonable level of loss, given where the bank is?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Murdo Fraser
It is helpful to have that put in context.
I want to ask about another specific investment, and an issue that has been raised with committee members. You have invested in the Gresham House forest growth and sustainability fund. We have had communication from the Lilliesleaf, Ashkirk and Midlem community council in the Borders. It is very concerned by Gresham House’s acquiring of an estate at Todrig and Whitslade, which is biodiverse moorland; its plan is to plant large numbers of Sitka spruce, and the community council is concerned that that will have a negative impact on biodiversity. I believe that Gresham House has received £50 million investment from SNIB. Given that your remit is to help the environment, is that investment reasonable?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay—we can pass that on.
I have met representatives of Gresham House, which is the number 1 commercial forestry planter in the UK. I note that, as of last December, it has assets under management of £8.7 billion, and its ambition is to grow its assets-under-management base to £200 billion by 2030. Why does it need £50 million of taxpayers’ money?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Murdo Fraser
I wonder whether I may interrupt you for a second, because what you have said is quite interesting. Do you think that, when the bank was set up and given a chunk of taxpayers’ money to invest, there was political pressure on the bank to get that money out the door—in other words, to invest in and to be seen to be engaging with the Scottish economy—and that, perhaps with hindsight, some of those investments might have needed more careful consideration?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thanks for putting that in context.
On the specifics, there is the satellite and digital connectivity firm Krucial, which has a provisioned £4.6 million loss; the £34 million investment in M Squared Lasers, much of which might be lost; and we previously had the loss in relation to Circularity Scotland. What lessons have been learned? Is there anything that you can do better in future to avoid losses?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay. Thank you.