The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 867 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Yes, and I should say that I have found you nothing but professional and courteous in all your dealings with me. I appreciate that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is all right. We are interested to hear your thoughts.
I have one more question, which is a little off topic, but I will ask it because you are here. It is about how the Standards Commission views how councillors function. I have heard examples of councillors who are in opposition being told by council officers that political criticism that they make of the council is a breach of the code of conduct. It seems to me that that is a stifling of legitimate political debate. In effect, they are bullied into not voicing public criticism of the council by officers telling them that they will be reported to the Standards Commission. I will not do so in public, but I could give you examples of that.
Given that you are the convener of the Standards Commission, can you reassure me that, in such circumstances, councillors would not be found guilty of a breach of the code of conduct for making a legitimate political criticism of council decisions?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
I think that it would be helpful to get an idea of whether we are talking about 10 per cent or above or below that figure.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is exactly what the committee is trying to determine.
I have just one more question on the back of my colleague Richard Leonard’s earlier questions about workload. You referenced a number of complaints against MSPs. As you will be well aware, I have had a number of complaints made against me; I am pleased to say that none of them has resulted in a guilty conclusion—at least, not yet. The complaints seem to have dried up a little bit recently, although I realise that, by making that comment, I might be giving a hostage to fortune. Do you keep a league table of the most-complained-about MSPs? [Laughter.]
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
No—that was very helpful, convener.
I am racking my brains trying to think of a body in which there is an investigating function and a board that determines, and in which that is done in-house. I cannot think of one, off the top of my head, but we will go away and have a think about that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Exactly. You might be right, but we will go away and have a think about it.
I have a slightly different question on the creation of new commissioners. We are interested in the criteria for the establishment of new commissioners or, as we call them, SPCB-supported bodies. Do you have any thoughts on the criteria as they stand, and how they could be improved?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
I guess that that is my concern. Raising awareness among practitioners is one thing, but not everybody who is purchasing something moveable would necessarily involve lawyers in the transaction. Whether it is a business or a consumer parting with quite a large sum of money for something, they might realise that there is a charge on it only after the event.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Having reflected on some of the questions that I asked earlier about protections for purchasers, I want to return to them.
I understand that consumers are not covered by the legislation, because only businesses can grant pledges and charges. What happens if somebody buys from a business but not in the ordinary course of business? It is probably easier to illustrate with an example. Mr Halcro Johnston has a farm, so he is conducting a business. He is granted a charge over his moveable assets, including his combine harvester. I decide that I am going to buy his combine harvester, because I am a collector of old combine harvesters. In that circumstance, would I be protected, or would I need to search the register to ensure that there was no charge against it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Because I am not a business.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
That would be helpful. There are consumer groups, for example, that would help to spread the word.