The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 747 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Having reflected on some of the questions that I asked earlier about protections for purchasers, I want to return to them.
I understand that consumers are not covered by the legislation, because only businesses can grant pledges and charges. What happens if somebody buys from a business but not in the ordinary course of business? It is probably easier to illustrate with an example. Mr Halcro Johnston has a farm, so he is conducting a business. He is granted a charge over his moveable assets, including his combine harvester. I decide that I am going to buy his combine harvester, because I am a collector of old combine harvesters. In that circumstance, would I be protected, or would I need to search the register to ensure that there was no charge against it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Because I am not a business.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I want to broaden the discussion out a little bit. The city deals were intended to deliver economic growth and provide a broader economic opportunity, but there is also an issue with the extent to which the businesses that you represent were able to benefit directly from the on-going work. Can you give me some reflections on that?
You have all suggested that, whether it be in relation to small businesses or women, no direct opportunities have been coming through from the city deals. How do you see the broader advantages of what is being delivered? For example, infrastructure projects are part of a lot of the city deals, and clearly they will have a broader economic impact that will benefit business.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a follow-up question—perhaps you can answer in reverse order, starting with Duncan Thorp. On the selection of projects in each city deal and how those were chosen, if we were doing this again, how would you set up the deals differently to try to address some of the concerns that you have raised?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Did that not happen? I remember lots of conversations taking place around city deals and people making bids for their projects.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thanks. I have one more question. Secretary of state, you mentioned the towns fund. In the area that I represent, the city of Perth was due to get some funding for three quite important cultural heritage projects. Has that money gone now, or is there still some prospect of it coming back?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Not if there was an underspend in the budget.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay, thanks. I have a broader question about city deal funding. Since the change of Government, has there been any change in the approach to the drawdown of funding or the checks and balances that are put in at a Government level, or is it just the same model that was followed by the previous Administration?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, secretary of state. I was very taken with the Prime Minister’s speech on Monday when he set out the Government’s ambitions for AI, which is a great opportunity. Of course, as we have heard, the Edinburgh and south-east Scotland deal includes the very successful data-driven innovation programme.
On the question of the supercomputer, I heard what you had to say about the funding issue. Is it not the case that at the time of the general election, the budget of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology was substantially underspent?
09:45Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay. As you probably know, at the time that the announcement about that project was made in August, it was hammered by people in the industry. Chris van der Kuyl, the businessman and games entrepreneur, said that it was an idiotic decision to cancel that project. What confidence can people have that it will come back and that we will see that development, which is so important to the University of Edinburgh and the wider economy?