The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 747 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Throughout this inquiry, we have heard a lot from different communities and stakeholders across Scotland. Generally, there has been a very positive message about city deals, what they have been able to deliver, the added value that they bring and all the projects that have come on board.
One of the things that the committee is interested in looking at is what happens next. Kevin Stewart and Gordon MacDonald both asked you about conversations that you have had with the UK Government. You said to Gordon that a lot of it “hangs on the UK Government’s spending review,” which we understand. However, in terms of planning ahead, has the Scottish Government had conversations with partners about the sort of projects that might form part of a phase 2 of the city deals? If you are in a discussion with the UK Government, being able to demonstrate that there is a pipeline of projects that might form part of round 2 of the city deals might be a useful argument to present.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
That was a very interesting answer. On the question of structures, a major factor in delivering the strategy successfully south of the border has been the metro mayors, who have the authority to drive it forward. Do our structures allow the political leadership at the local level to make that happen?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
To the relief of my colleagues, I will not mention flocks of sheep or combine harvesters today.
I place on record the fact that we got an eight-page response from you and that it was issued within 48 hours of your appearance at the committee last week and responded to points that were raised then. That excellent work is an exemplar of how ministers should behave.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, Mr Bruce. It is nice to see you. I will follow on from Lorna Slater’s line of questioning.
As a committee, we are interested in looking at potential consolidation across the whole landscape. There are too many commissioners, to put it bluntly. Are there economies that could be pursued? You have already addressed that question in relation to the Standards Commission for Scotland, but I want to probe that a little further. For complaints against parliamentarians, there is a check, because such complaints go to the SPPA Committee, which makes the final determination in relation to sanction. Are you saying that it would be prejudicial to complainers to have the Standards Commission and your office put together as one body?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Let me ask you a slightly different question, because the other area that the committee is interested in is the creation of new SPCB-supported bodies. Do you have any thoughts on what criteria should be prioritised when we consider that matter?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Yes, and I should say that I have found you nothing but professional and courteous in all your dealings with me. I appreciate that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is all right. We are interested to hear your thoughts.
I have one more question, which is a little off topic, but I will ask it because you are here. It is about how the Standards Commission views how councillors function. I have heard examples of councillors who are in opposition being told by council officers that political criticism that they make of the council is a breach of the code of conduct. It seems to me that that is a stifling of legitimate political debate. In effect, they are bullied into not voicing public criticism of the council by officers telling them that they will be reported to the Standards Commission. I will not do so in public, but I could give you examples of that.
Given that you are the convener of the Standards Commission, can you reassure me that, in such circumstances, councillors would not be found guilty of a breach of the code of conduct for making a legitimate political criticism of council decisions?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
You might not be able to answer this off the top of your head, but as a matter of experience and practice, how often does the Standards Commission reject a report that you have made against a councillor?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
We can perhaps pursue this with the Standards Commission in a moment, but I am interested to know on what basis the Standards Commission would say that you have done an investigation and determined a breach of the code of conduct on the part of a councillor but that it takes a different view.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I think that you were here for the questions that I asked Mr Bruce, and I want to ask you the same question as I asked him about the relationship between the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission. Do we need both bodies? Given that the committee is looking at the whole landscape of SPCB-supported bodies, would it be possible to have, in effect, one body doing the work? I am interested in hearing your perspective on that question.