Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1171 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Draft Climate Change Plan

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

It is the Government’s plan, so yes.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Draft Climate Change Plan

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

That seems to be a pragmatic way of dealing with it for the small operators. What does the tapering timeline look like? So that I am clear, is the issue for the smaller operators that there is a lack of capacity in energy-from-waste facilities, or do they not have the contracts in place?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Draft Climate Change Plan

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

Is the tapering dependent on those facilities being operational?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

My understanding is that they were looking for about £3.08 million over the next two financial years—£1.7 million this year and £1.3 million next year—which appears to be a very small part of the £436 million in your budget. From what we have been told, the consequence is that Wave Energy Scotland—which the Scottish Government set up in 2014—will be closed down and 10 full-time-equivalent jobs will be lost. Mocean Energy, a company based in Edinburgh, has said that it will have to close down, with 13 direct jobs being lost. What message does that cut send out about our ambition on marine energy in general, if we are quite literally pulling the plug on the key parts of trying to deliver wave energy?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

Okay, so the 45 per cent reduction is all associated with projects coming to an end.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

Thanks. My final area of questions is the funding and resourcing of the energy consents unit. That remains in the energy transition budget line, but ministerial responsibilities will move to the Minister for Public Finance. I want to understand the rationale for that. Are you satisfied that the ECU has sufficient resource to meet the demand that it is facing? Alongside that, are you satisfied that the statutory consultees such as NatureScot have the necessary resources available to them to meet the increasing demand that they are facing and ensure the timely discharge of consent applications?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Michael Matheson

I think that I started that process, if I recall correctly.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Michael Matheson

You have given a commitment to complete the dualling of the A9 by 2035, which you mentioned in your opening statement. What are the principal risks to achieving the target date?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Michael Matheson

Maybe you could provide us with a bit more detail on that. How much of the £3 billion that you are likely to invest in the A9 do you expect to stay in the Scottish economy?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Michael Matheson

I think that you have just increased the social aspects of the Scottish zero-emission bus challenge fund by doubling it. You have a clear social benefit target for the present ScotZEB round. Is that correct?