The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1072 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
That is clear to me with regard to part 2.
With regard to part 3, you are opposed to clauses 11 and 13, subject to negotiation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
So you consider that the bill is compatible with the ECHR.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
What if the evidence pointed to a non-senior member of staff? If their actions resulted in an offence under the bill, who should be prosecuted?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
Sure. As you have mentioned, the policy intention is to target senior management, but the threshold for liability in section 1 relates to intent and recklessness, so the actions of a non-senior member of staff could make them liable under the bill if it were enacted. Is my understanding of that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
I want to be clear in my understanding of this. Under section 1, the requirement for intent and recklessness means that, if there were evidence to suggest that a non-senior member of staff had acted in such a way, they could be prosecuted under the bill. I know what the policy intention is, but I am trying to be clear about whether, despite the stated intention, the provisions of the bill would not prevent a non-senior member of staff from being prosecuted. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
[Inaudible.]—I do not think that they would.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful. I am conscious that, as the member who introduced the bill, you are relying on advice from the non-Government bills unit and the Parliament’s legal team. This question is specifically for the Parliament’s legal team: why did you not identify the bill’s lack of compatibility with the ECHR?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
From the Parliament’s point of view, do you consider that the bill is compatible with the ECHR?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
Will you clarify the bill’s policy intention with regard to the definition of a “responsible individual”? We have received evidence that suggests that the table that you have provided in section 3(4) is likely to include people who might be viewed as non-senior staff. Is that the bill’s intention? If it is not, how will you seek to address that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Matheson
I am sorry, cabinet secretary, but can you decipher that for me, please?