The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 996 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Do any of the other witnesses want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
I turn to you, Mark Roberts, as the regulator of the regulators, if you like. Is there a risk that, if such a provision is not included in the bill, it could inhibit developments from taking place, because a licence would be needed, which could lead to further environmental damage in some perverse way?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Sarah Hendry, given your legal expertise, do you think that there is a strong evidence base to demonstrate that regulations of this nature, or a bill containing an offence of this nature, would have a significant deterrent effect?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That question is to Sarah Hendry.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Have you seen evidence of that happening in other jurisdictions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That is interesting. I suppose that you could get into a debate about the deterrent effect, as it might depend on the starting point of your environmental regulations and environmental law; once you create a criminal offence, there is the issue of how to enforce it, which also depends on your starting point.
I am interested to know what evidence base there is to support claims that the new offence will create a deterrent, compared with where we are just now. At one point, it was suggested that there has been an increase in the number of complaints but that the number of prosecutions has almost reached nil. Does that mean that a greater level of environmental harm is taking place now because there is not the level of enforcement that we would expect? There is an interesting relationship in there, which would need to be explored.
I will pick up on the issue of section 40 of the Regulatory Reform Act 2014. In its written evidence, SEPA suggests that an alternative route to the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill could be the creation of an offence that is equivalent to ecocide through amending the 2014 act. Would that be a preferable route to deal with the issue, rather than introducing a new piece of legislation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Would it therefore be fair to characterise the Scottish Government’s position in the LCMs as an interim position? That is, the Scottish Government supports the intention behind the bill and supports agreeing to a legislative consent motion, but, if the outstanding areas that you have concerns about are not sufficiently addressed by the UK Government, the potential final position of the Scottish Government could be to withhold consent. Am I understanding that correctly?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
If you do not get agreement on those clauses—I do not know what the timeframe looks like—is it possible that the Scottish Government would recommend that legislative consent be withheld?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. You have taken a negotiating position.
I turn to the issue of SAF. You correctly pointed out that there is significant potential for the manufacturing of SAF in Scotland. From the Scottish Government’s perspective, will you give us a sense of where the greatest potential is for sustainable aviation fuel? Is it in the first, second or third generation of SAF? Will the timeframe for the development of those three generations of SAF be different over the course of the next 10 years?