The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1199 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful.
I turn to Graeme Roy. A considerable part of the change that will be needed to meet our climate change targets will require private sector investment. I would be interested to hear your views on this. If there is a lack of clear leadership for and ownership of policy within the Government’s climate change plan, does that run the risk of making it difficult for the private sector to develop a clear understanding of the Government’s priorities and of how firms should target their investment in this area? If there is a lack of clarity, that could have an impact on our economy in the medium to longer term.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Matheson
If there is a lack of ownership in the governance processes, can that compromise accountability for the progress, or lack of progress, in key areas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Richard Dixon mentioned that there is no section 36 report in the process now. What would help or enhance the governance process and the monitoring and tracking of progress, or lack of progress? What positive step could the Government take to change the existing draft plan to make it more transparent and accountable?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
So, delaying net zero involves a cost from an adaptation perspective, as investment would have to go into infrastructure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning. Sticking with the theme of infrastructure investment, there is anxiety about the cost of investment that is needed to meet our climate change targets. You heard earlier about the cost of things such as heat pumps and so on. There is a suggestion that we should just ditch the 2045 and 2050 net zero targets but still try to make some progress in tackling climate change.
Is it fair to say that there is a direct correlation between the degree of global warming or climate change and the amount of investment that we must make in adaptation as a result? If so, to what extent do you think that there is the risk that, if we ditch those national targets, we will simply push the costs on to investment in climate adaptation, which we will need to do more of?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
As you say, there is a need to invest in infrastructure to meet the changes in our climate that we are experiencing. Given the capital investment profile of the Scottish and UK Governments and their infrastructure investment planning, do you see the scale of investment that is necessary to ensure that we have the right infrastructure in place to deal with the climate challenges that we face?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
It feels to me that, by and large, a lot of infrastructure investment that takes place to deal with some of these challenges happens because of incidents occurring—we see a flood, so we put in flood-mitigation measures to deal with it.
You mentioned that we do not track that type of investment. The CCC gives independent advice to the Scottish and UK Governments. Are you able to quantify exactly how much either of those Governments is spending on climate adaptation specifically?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
You mentioned the 2021 adaptation risk report and the figure of £5 billion to £10 billion. Is that an annual figure or is that figure over a five-year period, which is a period that a lot of capital investment programmes use?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
It is for Iain Batho. If an employee in a company acted negligently and outwith the company’s procedures and that resulted in an act that caused serious or significant environmental harm, who would be prosecuted in that instance? Would it be the company or the individual who had acted outwith the company’s procedures in a way that resulted in the harm being caused?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Can I pick up on the point about the overlap in law that would exist if the bill was passed? I am interested from a prosecutorial point of view. Obviously, it is not uncommon for there to be areas of criminal law that cross over one another. Does that present any challenges for you as a prosecutor in deciding which route to follow to take forward a prosecution?