The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 934 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I do not think that we can wait for hydrogen; we have to press on with decarbonisation using other options, beyond electrification, that can help to decarbonise our railways. I suspect that hydrogen trains are quite a long distance away. I also think that, on some of the high-speed routes, hydrogen would not be effective, because we would burn through so much that lines could not be operational. What other options are we looking at?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful. It will be useful for the committee to be kept up to date on where progress has been made and on the potential risks and issues that might arise, given that it is a live issue.
Let us turn to the question of where we are with the public performance measure. The annualised target is 92.5 per cent, which it has been for quite an extended period of time. As yet, ScotRail has not been able to achieve that percentage. From what I can see, the annualised figure is sitting at just under 90 per cent—although the periodic figure is slightly better for the past four weeks. We have not seen a significant improvement on the PPM. We are broadly in line with where it was in 2008, 2009 and 2010, and that was still below the target. What are the principal inhibitors to our achieving the annualised 92.5 per cent PPM figure?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
There is nothing else to finish on my line of questioning, but I want to pick up on the issue of pricing and the 3 to 12 percentage point increase that was mentioned. I presume that all of that cost does not have to go into the ticket. The airline could try to push some of it across its wider cost base, whether that involves its maintenance companies, service companies, terms and conditions of staff or airport operations. That is how some of the low-cost carriers operate. I presume that the cost could be dispersed in other ways, rather than being put straight on to tickets. Is that a fair assessment?
10:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning. I want to turn to the potential for the production of SAF in Scotland. You will be aware of project willow, which identified two potential projects for SAF production in Grangemouth—project 6 and project 8. One was for HEFA and the other was for e-methanol and methanol to jet. Do you have a view on whether the proposals that are set out in project willow are realistic and deliverable within the timeframes that have been set?
In case you are not familiar with the timeframes, the timeframe for the HEFA project was 2032 and that for project 8, which is e-methanol and methanol to jet, was 2035. I was struck by Professor Maroto-Valer’s comment that the infrastructure at Grangemouth would allow us to do things more quickly, but those timeframes do not seem to be very short. What are your thoughts on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
The timeline for HEFA is 2032 and the timeline for e-methanol and methanol to jet is 2035. Do you think that both of those timelines are ambitious?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
I turn to the issue of the role that low-carbon hydrogen might play in supporting development of the SAF sector.
Graham Hutchings made specific reference to the issue of green and blue hydrogen and the way in which they are being used at the moment. Graham, can I get a bit more detail from you? How important will the low-carbon hydrogen sector be to the development of the SAF sector? [Interruption.]
Hold on—I cannot hear you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Mark Morrison, you have done some work for Scottish Enterprise in this area.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
I want to go back to the point about the way in which the bill is currently drafted. If the bill sets a threshold for what the sector must achieve, that could incentivise the production of SAF close to the major airports, which would make it cheaper for the airlines to purchase SAF. Therefore, the development of SAF could be concentrated in areas around Manchester and London, to service Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester airports. Is there a danger that that could act as a disincentive to invest in some of the projects that are highlighted in project willow, which would involve a significant level of capital expenditure? If the Government takes an approach that does not encourage greater use of SAF across all our airports in the UK, is that a risk?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful; thank you.
Is there a danger that the bill as drafted could act as a disincentive to capital investment in SAF production at Grangemouth? One investment might be £900 million, with the other project having up to £2.1 billion of capital expenditure, both at today’s prices.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
No—that was helpful. I do not know whether anyone else wants to comment on the importance of the sector.