The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1171 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
The buck stops with you. You confirmed earlier that there are cases in which you are not able to make it on time, but you were not able to give us the details. We know that it happens. I know that it happens. I am asking you for details of the oversight that you have as the chief executive of the organisation in making sure that you are addressing these issues when they arise, how you go about doing that and how you make sure that the board has proper oversight of the issue. I ask that because it is an on-going issue for the industry that you do not have the necessary capacity to deal with the demand that you face for dealing with energy consents.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
No, it is not my view. You have already confirmed that there are cases in which it does not happen.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Are there times when you do not make it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Good morning. I want to step back from the exchange with Monica Lennon and deal with the process. If an individual committed an offence on the bus, what evidential threshold would be used for determining any decision to remove their bus pass?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
What exactly will the individual whose bus pass is potentially being removed receive? They will receive notification from Transport Scotland, but will they also receive details of the evidence that has been submitted by either the bus company or the police in support of the removal of the bus pass, so that, when they respond to any application, they will understand the details of what they are responding to?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
I understand that—I am not asking whose decision it is. I am just trying to establish the point that there has to be an evidential threshold, and that that evidential threshold has to be the balance of probabilities. Indeed, I cannot see how you can do it any other way, unless you are going to set up a court of law just to deal with bus passes. If someone commits an offence on a bus, and they are subsequently convicted of it in a criminal court, their bus pass will go, because they will have exceeded the threshold that would justify its removal. We should be clear about that, and I think that that deals with the question whether someone who commits a sexual offence on a bus and is convicted of it will have their bus pass removed. Of course, that will have to be referred into the system for it to be initiated.
That brings me on to my next question, which is about the review mechanism involved. I presume that these matters will go back into Transport Scotland for review, but I also presume—and I appreciate that you might not have the detail of this yet—that any decision maker reviewing a matter would be outwith the original decision-making process, either in a different part of Transport Scotland, the Government or elsewhere. I presume that the intention is to separate that decision-making process and the individuals involved in the previous decision-making process.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Okay. It would be interesting to see a breakdown of the cases that go to the ECU—against local authorities—for which you are not able to meet the timeframes, what the reasons are for that and what actions you have taken, as well as how you ensure that the board has proper oversight of those issues when they arise.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
It would be good if you could provide that in writing.
How does your organisation, with the resources that you have, respond to the challenge that you face when you are unable to meet the timeframes for planning applications for which you are a statutory consultee? What happens? You are the chief executive and you are in charge, so the buck stops with you. What do you do to ensure that your agency is taking action to prevent that happening in the future?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Good afternoon, cabinet secretary. The instrument is an important step, given the challenges that the previous regulations have posed for the development of projects. I suppose that one of the key issues will be the governance process for the decision making on where mitigations for a particular project can be put in place and how that process will be managed and prioritised. How will that governance process operate in order to decide where an alternative form of mitigation could take place? How will that work on a four-nations basis, given that it is possible that mitigations could take place across the whole of the UK?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
The hierarchy is helpful in trying to understand part of the process. Outwith the direct project, who will decide what the mitigations to offset the habitats impact of the project should be? Will the developer put forward the proposal on, for example, plans to do stoat or rat eradication on a particular island? Or will the developer accept that it cannot mitigate it all within its particular site and therefore seek advice from a third party, through the Scottish Government, to direct what the mitigation should be? I am trying to understand what that process looks like.