The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 996 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Yes. I am talking about a situation where the company or corporate organisation had done everything that it should have done and all the procedures were there, but an employee acted in a way that was outwith the company’s procedures and that resulted in significant environmental harm. Some have suggested that the bill should be amended so that, irrespective of that, the directors of the company should be prosecuted. That is not in the bill, but it has been suggested that the bill should be amended to do that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning. We have had a bit of a rear-view look at potential instances that could be covered by the bill. No one has identified any instances that have occurred since 2014—I think that Mr MacLeod went as far as saying that.
I am interested in the witnesses’ views on looking forward. Given your experience, are there gaps in the existing legal framework in this area that could interfere with your ability to prosecute a case in which severe environmental harm or significant environmental harm has occurred? Iain Batho, are you able to comment on that, given your expertise in prosecuting in this area?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Of course.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That is an interesting concept. From what you are saying, if you are looking to increase your chances of getting a conviction and we have both the section 40 offence and the offence that is in the bill, you are more likely to pursue prosecution under section 40, even though that will have a capped sentence, because that may be easier for you to prosecute. Is that what you are suggesting could happen?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
My issue is that we have received evidence suggesting that there should be an amendment to the bill so that it could be applied only to senior management.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That could be potentially one of the unintended consequences of having two areas of law that overlap one another on this matter.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. I will bring in Murdo MacLeod.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Ricardo, can I clarify something? Are you suggesting that the regulatory authorities in England and Wales are issuing civil penalties for crimes that, based on the definition of ecocide in the bill, the bill would make a criminal offence in Scotland if it was enacted?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful, because there has been some suggestion of the bill being amended so that only senior managers in an organisation could be prosecuted. I am trying to understand the situation where an employee carries out an act that causes significant environmental harm but was outwith the company’s procedures and that they should not have done. How would you then prosecute a senior manager or director of an organisation who knew nothing about that and was not involved in it? If a person acted outwith the company’s procedures, you might then pursue a prosecution against a senior manager that could result in that person being imprisoned for up to 20 years. I do not understand how you would take that forward as a prosecutor or how our courts would look at it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
My point is not about the provisions that are in the bill; it is about the suggestion that those provisions should be removed in a way that would mean that the only individuals who could be prosecuted are senior managers.