The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2501 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
What is the concern, then?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in a scenario in which the bill, as it stands, is passed into law. What would change in your sector as a result and is that to do with governance or risk management?
Catherine, you represent a wide range of interests including, I imagine, big oil and gas majors such as Shell and BP with complex corporate governance structures, right through to SMEs. Let us start with the bigger companies: what are your bigger members telling you would be the impact on the culture in the board in relation to governance and risk management if the bill were to become law?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
No immediate changes are required. You operate in a highly regulated environment, with ministerial objectives and an economic regulator. Is that system fit for purpose under the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is your concern with the marine directorate that the science is not agreed? Fishers could be trawling and dredging in an area with no understanding of the impact that it will have on species, so someone could come back later and say that they have just dredged out the last remaining flame shell reef or something like that. Is it the shifting nature of data and understanding of the environment that is causing your members concern, because they do not know whether they will be retrospectively charged with ecocide under the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you have any comments on the defence of necessity in the bill? Are there any examples of where that would come up as a defence from any of your sectors?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is quite broad, because you could put a wind farm in one location and perhaps have less environmental impact, or you could fish from a part of the sea where there is no environmental pressure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Simon Parsons, are there particular examples in the water industry of something being absolutely necessary?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I know that Monica Lennon wants to come in, so I will leave it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
This has been a fascinating evidence session, and I certainly welcome the bill coming to the committee at stage 1. Sometimes members’ bills can highlight the Government’s blind spots, so the session has been really interesting. I want to pick up on a couple of things that came out of Kevin Stewart’s questioning.
First of all, we have this system of environmental regulation and environmental permitting, and I am interested in other jurisdictions that have adopted ecocide as an overarching offence. Has that driven reform of regulation, permitting and licensing, simply because of an underlying fear that some of the regulations are not fit for purpose and that, even though companies might have a licence under those regulations, they might, in some extreme examples, still be found by a court of law to have committed ecocide? I am just interested in finding out what this overarching legal change will do, if anything, to drive further environmental regulatory reform.
Professor Fogleman, I see you nodding vigorously.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Did you want to come in, Dr Fifield?