The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2735 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you think that the Scottish Government’s current infrastructure investment plan recognises that scenario of 3°C or 4°C? Is that baked into it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
You inspired me, convener. Richard Millar, the CCC puts forward different pathways. You have a balanced pathway and a high ambition pathway. Given what you have said about 3°C and 4°C, should we not be going for the high ambition pathway? Given the threats that you have outlined today, the tipping points and the catastrophic impacts of potentially going above 2°C, should we not be going for a higher ambition rather than balancing things out?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
What would that mean for the UK?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
So the approach is very much about creating the right foundation for adaptation now—in the next decade or two—and then being able to build on that, rather than say, “Okay. This community is unliveable. We need to abandon it” or, for instance, in a coastal community, “We cannot build our way out of this. We cannot adapt”.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
But not 3°C?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are some of those infrastructure solutions scalable? You mentioned the Thames barrier. Did we have a 3°C or 4°C world in mind when options were being looked at for that? Could future investment in the next five to 10 years be scaled up in the decades ahead to meet the needs of a 3°C or 4°C warming world, or do you reach a point where you say, “Okay, we are just going to have to think again”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have taken that approach because we believe that it is more comprehensive. We do not want to create a loophole that means that the track owner can be penalised but those who are racing the dogs, putting them in the traps and providing them are not included. It is a more thorough approach.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have had some discussions. I have met Paul Brignal, particularly when he came to the committee, and I have received some correspondence from him. The tone of some of that correspondence is a little difficult when it comes to opening up a constructive conversation. The work that was done to look at an alternative use for the Thornton stadium and the economic impact that that could bring is a useful piece of information, but it was certainly not part of the evidence that I brought forward with the bill.
I ask Nick Hawthorne to say a little about what is in the financial memorandum about the costs of implementation of the bill and how that relates to the question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
There has been no greyhound racing in Scotland for some time and I have seen no evidence of other types of racing emerging as a result, but it would be for the Government, charities and others to continue to review whether there is any kind of displacement. I have not heard any evidence of that and I do not remember the committee hearing substantial evidence of it, but we need to be alive to the possibility.
Perhaps the provision in the bill that alters the definition of the track is the way to address that. GBGB’s comments are important, and I have considered the issue of undergrounding, which is, in part, where the provision on the definition of a track comes from. If some other form of unregulated greyhound racing emerges, the Parliament, ministers, charities and those with an interest in animal welfare would want to be alive to the impacts. At that point, there would be a case for amending the legislation, and there is a mechanism for the Government to do that using a statutory instrument.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am not convinced that there is a case for that.