The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4689 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Now that we have covered the procedure that we will follow, we will move to the substantive business. Amendment 1, in the name of Daniel Johnson, is grouped with amendments 2, 3, 7 and 23.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
There is also the issue of broadening the tax base, which we might come to in a few minutes.
I found it really quite touching that you wrote in paragraph 3.1 of your report something that you have reiterated today:
“Political parties need to be clear about what the Scottish Government can afford and the impact on public spending for people in Scotland. Manifestos should make clear if any additional spending commitments set out would need cuts to other areas of spending or raising more revenue to fund them.”
I thought that it was quite sweet and innocent of you to write that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Governments, wherever they are, always talk about reducing spending or keeping spending the same, and, if they increase it—I say that because, if we look at the big picture, we can see that there are real-terms increases—that increase might be less than is required. However, efficiencies do not always follow: the fact that you are spending less money in an area does not mean that it will become more efficient.
09:30
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
It all comes back to outcomes.
Thank you for those responses. Michelle Thomson will ask the next questions.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Okay, that is fine—apologies.
In paragraph 3.28, on local government services, you stated that
“the Improvement Service reported that in 2022-23 and 2023-24”—
that is a couple of years back—
“(the most recent data available) more performance indicators declined than improved … 45 per cent compared to 39 per cent”.
Will you tell us what you think the reasons for that are? Is that balanced? For example, were the 45 per cent of indicators that declined in large or small areas of local government spending, or were they equally balanced? Some indicators might be quite small while others might be significant. Will you tell us a wee bit more about that picture?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
In paragraph 1.51, you point out that 93.5 per cent of the Scottish capital budget effectively comes from Westminster, so we are basically at the mercy of the decisions that are taken there. That was a big feature of your presentation last Thursday. I think that we all accept that we are having a real-terms reduction in capital, and it is probably deeper in real terms than you say, because we use a gross domestic product deflator, which I have talked about before. That means that delays and cost overruns have an even more adverse impact on maintenance and new capital projects, does it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
It is in all age groups, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. We will go to Liz Smith, followed by John Mason.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Of course, it is not just global events. We touched on the fact that the UK Government’s policy decisions are having huge impacts. A year ago, we were facing an £800 million reduction because of what we thought were going to be disability benefit cuts, which did not take place, and we did not think that the mitigation of the two-child benefit cap was going to happen. There was a potential £1 billion loss because of income tax changes, and then we had the national insurance contribution increases. The UK Government alone toyed with up to £2 billion of potential detriment to the Scottish budget. That goes back to one of the cornerstones of the fiscal framework, which is no detriment. As we have already heard this morning, in the past year alone, there has been huge turbulence and uncertainty in Scotland’s finances because the no-detriment aspect of the fiscal framework has not really been adhered to. The Government could, on a whim, have deducted £1 billion from our budget, if it had decided to cut income tax, which, of course, it did not.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Yes, from a technical point of view, but, in reality, at the end of the day, we are like a ship that can be tossed any way in a storm.