The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3893 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Are you talking about a total exemption or a discount? If it is a discount, what percentage are you talking about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Looking at the evidence, we see everyone talking about exemptions. If all the exemptions were in place, there would not be any money to collect. Anna Gardiner, in your submission, you said:
“we would suggest that an exemption in the region of 50 units would provide a more meaningful degree of protection in rural Scotland.”
I do not know how many developments of more than 50 units there are in rural Scotland—I cannot imagine that there are many. Surely developers would just build 49-unit developments, to avoid the tax.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Go on—tell us all!
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That appears to have exhausted the questions from the committee.
I would make an appeal to you, minister. You have mentioned flexibility, and you have talked about the outcomes of most impact. On the credibility of the budget and the portfolios that we discuss and debate as we go through the three stages of the budget, we are dealing with stuff like investment in the integration of health boards and social care, costing £257.2 million this year, a transfer of £79.2 million from housing to local government within the finance and local government portfolio for discretionary housing payments and a transfer of £49.3 million from health and social care to the education and skills portfolio to pay the teaching grant for nursery and midwifery students. Given that such transfers are happening every single year at this point, would it not be much better to have such funds in the budgets where delivery will take place? I do not see how that would adversely affect outcomes, although it might affect how some budget portfolios look, in the context of the public presentation of the budget. There is perhaps an element of that in Government thinking.
I wonder how many more years we will have those continuing transfers for, given that they happen every single year. As the Parliament has to vote for a budget every year, the more the budget reflects actual expenditure, the better it will be.
10:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The Supreme Court ruling is also mentioned in paragraph 9 of your submission.
Fionna Kell, you said in your submission that the Government is pursuing
“a £30m funding target that is not based on accurate estimate of the work required or funding gap.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The briefing paper says:
“The Transport portfolio ... has delivered £53 million in capital savings through reprofiling the vessel procurement schedule”.
Is that Government-speak for delay?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You do not need to leave us—you just got here. [Laughter.]
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You said in your submission:
“We must stress the importance of a discounted levy rate for schemes on previously developed land. ”
How would that work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Another question that I seem to find myself asking every year is about pensions. For example, the justice and home affairs portfolio received an additional £122.6 million, of which £72.7 million relates to police and fire pensions. There is another £141.9 million addition for NHS and teacher pension costs. As I said last year, surely the Government knows more than one year in advance what pensions are likely to be for the number of teachers, firefighters or police officers. I can understand that the estimate might not be exact, but there seems to be a chronic underestimation of what those costs will be, with multimillion-pound increases every year to make up for that. What is the Scottish Government doing to assess those figures more accurately and effectively so that we do not see the same extent of adjustment next year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am not suggesting that we change those; I am suggesting that there is concern about the accuracy of the figures, which means that the autumn budget revisions need to be revised more than perhaps they should be. It is about trying to get accuracy in the figures.