The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4778 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I want to thank you both. The committee appreciates your professionalism, your expertise and the time that you have surrendered to give evidence to us today. It is much appreciated and your evidence will certainly be included in our report. Thank you both very much, gentlemen.
I suspend the meeting for five minutes to allow a changeover of witnesses and to give members a break.
10:41 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that. You used the term “last resort”. What would you consider to be a last resort?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Although you said that people are kept within budget, you talked earlier on about how the two-year timeframe can be extended. Is that the same for budgets—but that it is unlikely and does not happen often?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Maybe aye, maybe no.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We do not have select committees. Do you mean a parliamentary committee?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Fine. I am happy with that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It does make sense. Organisations and lawyers representing the families of victims and so on put on pressure to have judge-led inquiries because that is perceived as the gold standard. We are now in a situation whereby, if a judge does not lead an inquiry, it almost devalues it even before it starts. That is the public perception. We have heard from other witnesses how effective non-judge-led inquiries can be but, if the public is not listening to that and if the people who feel that they have been wronged and on whose behalf the inquiry is being held do not accept that, it is difficult. That does not mean that it should not be a retired judge as opposed to a judge who is serving. That would, hopefully, stop some of the bottlenecks in the court system that result from judge-led inquiries.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
As John Mason pointed out—it was in the report that we had from Professor Dahlström—the Swedish Covid inquiry started in June 2020 and had produced a report within a matter of months. Do you feel that adopting an early approach, when a problem is building, is needed? In this country, we sometimes find that things come out of the blue—disasters can happen; I mentioned Piper Alpha earlier, for example. However, sometimes things build and build. As you said, with Covid, everyone knew that there would be an inquiry into the pandemic. Did you feel that starting that was perhaps delayed too long in Scotland and in the UK?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that. One of the significant points made in your report is that Government offices provide
“administrative services to commissions of inquiry. These services include fully furnished office rooms, IT and telecommunications equipment, and information and advice on administrative matters and archives”.
From our perspective, that sounds like a remarkably sensible approach, given that, often, when we have inquiries we have to reinvent the wheel. Before an inquiry can kick off, it can take many months not only to find an appropriate chair but to find premises and get a secretariat together. How impactful is that set-up on the ability in Sweden to make sure that commissions start promptly and also rein in costs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Finally, although you are not allowed to compel witnesses under the Swedish system, is there a feeling that people, although not compelled to attend, generally do so? The implication is that perhaps one or two vital witnesses in the Estonian inquiry decided not to give evidence. Is that the case? One would have thought that, even though people are not compelled to attend, the general pressure would mean that they feel obliged to participate.