The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4689 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
We had a couple of preliminary goes at this last week, and we also discussed the matter in the chamber last Wednesday, so I think that we have talked about some of this already. In some ways, I feel like Elizabeth Taylor’s eighth husband: I know what to do—I just do not know how to make it interesting.
I want to start with an issue that we did not touch on last week—housing. The figures for housing on page 93 of the budget document look very impressive. At this point, I should say that I am going to refer to the autumn budget revision figures wherever possible, because I think that they are the most accurate when it comes to comparing like with like—and I have to say that we do really appreciate the increase in information, although we will touch on that a wee bit more as we go along.
We are seeing a quite substantial increase in the total housing and building standards line from £634 million to £813 million. Below that table, though, we see details of the affordable housing supply programme, which comprises
“Capital, Transfer of Management of Development Funding and Financial Transactions”,
That totals some £926 million. I work that out as a 45 per cent increase in housing spend next year. Is that actually the case? Can you give us a wee bit more information about those numbers? I just want to ensure that we are comparing like with like, given that there is no AHSP line anywhere in the tables.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Just before you come in, Richard, can you tell us where we can compare that £926 million with, say, the 2025-26 ABR figure? If we look at the fourth line of the table on page 93, we see £634.9 million going to £813.8 million, and then there is just a bullet point below that table. I just want to know exactly where the difference is in the year-on-year actual spend.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Some of them are not. The one that I am talking about is not complex at all. It is a road issue and it has been there for 22 years. I have raised the issue in the chamber so many times that I am fed up, but every time I get the same answer about when Government processes are complete. It has been 25 months since the committee first raised the issue of an infrastructure delivery pipeline. When you produce that, we need a lot more detail in the document, rather than links to other places where we have to go searching for further information.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Overall resource funding is up by about 1.1 per cent in real terms. I take on board what you are saying. When one looks at the scale of the budget, £750 million would be all of that.
There have been a number of comments on the issue of colleges over the past couple of weeks. I asked you a question about that in the chamber when the draft budget was announced. You said in your statement that there is a £70 million uplift, which is about 10 per cent. If we look at net college resource, which is on the fourth line down on page 61 of the budget document, the autumn budget revision figure is £662.1 million and the budget figure is £721.1 million, which is a difference of £59 million. College capital expenditure goes down by £6.1 million.
I am looking to see where the £70 million is in those figures.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Maybe others will wish to look deeper into that.
One of the Government’s priorities is to grow the economy. However, if we look at level 3 figures on page 84 of the document, we see that total enterprise, trade and investment spend is to go down, from £419.6 million to £397.7 million. We see significant reductions in Scottish Enterprise and Highlands and Islands Enterprise funding from the ABR figure, and even from the outturn figure for 2024-25.
How will the Government continue to grow the economy to the level that we want if there are going to be year-on-year reductions in enterprise agency funding? I believe that that issue has been going on for a considerable period of time.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
I appreciate that, but we are just trying to get a clear picture of where budgets have gone—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Okay, I could go into that more, but I realise that others are keen to come in.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
You have, but the money is not reaching the national performing companies. If the culture budget was static, we might say, “Fair enough,” but it seems odd that, at a time when the culture budget is growing very healthily—we all appreciate that, and Angus Robertson has done a lot of good work in arguing for his sector—the performing companies are receiving real-terms reductions, given their flat-cash allocations.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. We will move on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Kenneth Gibson
I just want to come in for a wee second, cabinet secretary. You suggested that the explanation for this was on table 8.09, if I heard you right—