The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3978 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The point is, though, that the Sheku Bayoh inquiry, as Michael Marra pointed out, covers only a small number of people in one town and a certain incident, whereas the Scottish Covid inquiry covers a lot of people—the whole of Scotland—but so far the latter is still less expensive than the former. I make that point with regard to the purpose of the work that we are doing as a committee.
10:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
From the figures that I have seen, the cost of the Sheku Bayoh inquiry is over £51 million and rising. Even if it was £10 million, that would still, to me, seem like an awful lot of money for one specific incident in comparison with the complexity of Covid—although, even if we consider the Covid inquiry in that context, we might note that the Swedish Covid inquiry cost less than £2 million and took only a few months. The people of Sweden appear to be content with their inquiry, which concluded four years ago, and they are certainly more content with how Covid was handled.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That concludes questions from my colleagues. I will finish with one or two questions.
One subject that we have not touched on is consultants. When the Scottish Parliament information centre initially provided us with details of the costs of public inquiries over the past decade, we were advised that 10 per cent of the amount was spent on consultants. However, despite asking numerous witnesses and SPICe itself, we were unable to find out what that 10 per cent actually consists of.
I see that Don McGillivray is shaking his head. I wonder whether he has some information on what that is all about.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The reason why I asked the question is that it is obviously a significant part of the £258.8 million overall cost, and it has been a bit frustrating trying to find out the detail of that over the past six months.
I turn to another issue that we have. We talked about judges, and you have referred to a sense of injustice, inquiries shining a light and so on. However, we have to remember that—as I mentioned earlier—if we have judge-led inquiries and those judges are not dealing with ordinary trials, it is the people involved in those trials for whom justice is probably being denied or delayed.
From what I can see, that issue has not been considered adequately. If the Scottish Government continues to appoint judges, even if it says that that is not necessarily the route that always has to be taken, surely that just reinforces the view that is conveyed to the public by the media and others that only a judge-led inquiry is valid. It is reinforcing an approach that is more expensive and time consuming.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What about lawyers going on television to demand the extension or establishment of inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. Michelle Thomson wants to make a final point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 32nd meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. We have one public item on our agenda today, which is our final evidence session on the cost-effectiveness of public inquiries.
We are joined by Kate Forbes, MSP, Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic, and Donald McGillivray, director of safer communities. Just arriving are Emma Thomson, solicitor at the Scottish Government legal directorate, and Marion McCormack from civil courts, justice transformation and inquiries.
I welcome you all to the meeting, and invite the Deputy First Minister to make a short opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We are talking about UK legislation, so how much room for manoeuvre does the Scottish Government have on such issues?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I appreciate that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The police are representing the public. It is the public purse. It is not their money; it is our money.