The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4060 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
That assumes 100 per cent displacement, however, and I thought that the whole point of the green ports was to create new, additional jobs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
A quick wee calculation off the top of my head tells me that, if there are 18,000 top-rate taxpayers, they each pay an average of just under £140,000 a year. That is a very interesting section of the tax-paying public indeed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I think that about 12,000 more people are employed in the sector. However, the productivity outcome is not something that we looked at when we were doing post-legislative scrutiny in this area a year or so ago.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
That concludes questions from the committee. I have one further question, which is about David Bell’s paper. John Mason touched on it, so I thought that I should do likewise.
In the exchange, we discussed the issue of potential spending changes and tax changes that will be necessary—not the specifics, but the fact that they might be necessary. Professor Bell talks about loss aversion, which is something that I have raised before in the committee. That is the issue whereby people, if you give them additional funding for whatever, simply shrug their shoulders and say, “Thanks”, but if you take something away, they are extremely hostile to that, and it causes much more of a political backlash than the gain that you would get from doing something to give them the same financial sum.
What implications does that have for long-term fiscal sustainability and the ability of Governments to take decisions that may require to be taken?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I wanted to end on that because fiscal sustainability is going to be the key issue in our budget scrutiny this year.
I thank you very much for your evidence today, Professor Roy and Professor Breedon, and I also thank Claire Murdoch. It is very much appreciated, as always.
It has been a reasonably long session so far, so I call a break until 11 o’clock.
10:51 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Derek, you talk in your submission about some 75,000 jobs. I have to be honest and say that the numbers seem quite fantastical to me. What are your concerns regarding displacement? When previous Governments have introduced enterprise zones, there have been concerns that they have simply moved jobs from one part of the country to another part. Obviously, that is particularly acute in areas that border such zones, including, in this case, green freeports.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
The next item on our agenda is an evidence session with the Scottish Fiscal Commission on its “Forecast Evaluation Report” and its paper on “Productivity and Fiscal Sustainability”, both of which were published on 29 August 2023.
I welcome from the Scottish Fiscal Commission Professor Graeme Roy, chair, Professor Francis Breedon, commissioner, and Claire Murdoch, head of fiscal sustainability and public funding.
I intend to allow up to 75 minutes for this session. Before we open to questions from the committee, I invite Professor Roy to make a short opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
You are absolutely right. That is, of course, a policy choice, and I am not asking you to make such policy choices, because you would demur if I did so. However, it is interesting that you have touched on the situation with the current devolution arrangements and have said that we would have to change public spending or tax policy. What would we have to change to bring the finances into long-term sustainability?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Colleagues will press some of those issues further as we progress through the meeting. I do not want to hog the whole meeting. The first colleague to ask questions will be Ross Greer and he will be followed by John Mason.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that, Professor Roy.
I will kick off the questions and then open up the discussion to members of the committee.
I will start with the issue that you have just touched on. I will not quote the full paragraph in your letter, but you have said:
“While higher productivity growth has a clear positive effect on the economy, the net effects on the public finances are complicated and to improve fiscal sustainability will require changes in public spending or tax policy.”
Professor Spowage talked about that at our away day last week. I would be interested if you could explain the reasoning for the fact that increased productivity might not reduce the sustainability gap. That is crucial to our deliberations as we move forward, and it is important to get that on the record.
The second issue is the changes that would be required to close that gap, even in a situation in which we have increasing productivity.