The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4689 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you, minister, for that and for the amount of detail that the Scottish Government provides for spring and autumn budget revisions—there are 186 pages in the meeting papers document. Previously, we have seen a fraction of that. There has certainly been an improvement in transparency over the years, which is greatly appreciated.
The document says that the budget revision does not affect the Government’s spending plans. However, for the technical changes, we are talking about a net increase in the budget of £3,777.6 million. Based on that alone, it looks as though the budget is getting something in the region of a 5 per cent increase—more than that, in fact; it is more like 6 per cent. Can you talk us through those technical adjustments?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. When you refer to factors that are outside your control, what are you talking about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Craig Hoy, you can pop back in.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
I have a few more questions. One issue that comes up every year is pensions. There is an increase of £115.7 million in forecast future NHS and teachers’ pension costs. I appreciate that it has no impact on the Scottish Government’s discretionary spend, but I wonder why there is a substantial underestimate of those costs every year—whether for the police, fire services, teachers or the NHS—given that we know when folk will retire. I have made that point on numerous occasions. There seems to be a huge adjustment in both the autumn and spring budget revisions.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
I am not particularly convinced by that, but we will move on, as I have other things to raise.
The committee has raised many times—and the Government has done a lot of work to take into account—the fact that sums get moved every year, sometimes twice a year. It seems to me that it is the same sums that get moved every year.
For example, the transfer of £186.5 million from education and skills to local government, which falls within the finance and local government portfolio, is to support teacher numbers. Surely that amount should have been in the local government portfolio to start off with. We have this argument that there is policy and there is delivery, but seeing those changes distorts the budget lines. In 2026-27, will that figure be put in education and skills again, or will it be in the local government portfolio, which is where it should be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
If it is a set number, surely it should sit in the area where the policy will be delivered. It seems to me—and I am sure to other colleagues—to be an odd way of looking at it. If you know that a sum of money will be moved, it should ultimately sit in the area where it will be deployed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Whether the figure is £186.5 million or £200 million, it should sit in the area where it will be deployed. It seems odd to put it in education and skills if it will always be spent by local government. The Government will not suddenly remove that £186.5 million, will it? The figure will either stay the same in the next financial year or go up. What is the point of having it in a portfolio if it will not be spent there and you know that it will be spent in a different portfolio? It doesnae make sense.
Two other examples come from transfers from health and social care to education and skills—one is £22.7 million for new medical places and the other is to support teaching fees. Again, those transfer figures are recirculated every year. It would make everything more transparent if the money were allocated to the portfolio where it is to be deployed.
11:45
I will make a couple of other points before we wind up. We have not touched on ScotWind today, although the committee has raised such issues a number of times previously. The finance update to us says:
“it is now possible to release £188 million of the planned draw down of ScotWind funding in-year to support the 2026-27 Scottish Budget and future years of the Spending Review.”
In the ABR, £341 million was committed from ScotWind, but that sum has been reduced to the one that I just mentioned. That is quite a substantial difference.
The ScotWind figures seem to always go up and down, with the funding being deployed, to an extent, as though it is part of the Scotland reserve. How much money is currently in the ScotWind fund? Does the Government intend to use that funding to more or less cushion resource spending in the future, or will it be used for capital spending, as was the original plan?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
It is an accounting measure. Ultimately, does that mean that there has been a slowdown in the delivery of some city deals?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Of course.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
There is also an argument, which others might raise, that it should be an independent committee. All the committees need to be covered effectively with members, so I suppose that it is about trying to get the optimum balance.