The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1041 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
I have strong views, but I accept that this is a committee and that other members may have different views.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
If that is the case, then I think that my point has been answered, because if he is dissatisfied, he has had the opportunity to speak.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
I apologise.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
You pointed to the different skill sets that there are on the panel. Do you decide collectively? Is there a small quorum of people who are available in respect of particular cases, or is there a round-table discussion among the panel? How many people are on the panel?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
Yes.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
How many cases have been turned down by Redress Scotland, and why?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
If the clerks are saying that he has seen the submission from the Scottish Ambulance Service, he will have had the opportunity to respond.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Fergus Ewing
We want to try to find out the facts, so it would be helpful—if you are not prevented from telling us—if you could write to us, without naming names, to explain for what reason the 4 per cent were turned down. I am pleased to hear that it is a small number.
I want to focus on material that we have received from the Law Society of Scotland and from Thompsons Solicitors. The problems arise from the guidance—perhaps from the act itself—and the exceptions from eligibility. The Law Society has put it quite clearly that
“It is unfortunate”
—that is a sort of lawyerly euphemism; in my opinion, it is a bloody disgrace—
“for this particular group that access to the Scheme is based on who decided to place the child into care, in the short or longer term, and does not take into account whether the abuse took place at an emanation of the state”.
That question of whether the placement was voluntary or involuntary seems to me to be completely irrelevant. Would you not agree? If a child was placed in the care of the state, in loco parentis, and that child was abused, the intention of the person who put the child there does not really matter, surely. I do not want to put you on the spot, but, as a human being, would you not agree with the proposition that that criterion is just insupportable?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Fergus Ewing
I will add that it has been brought to my attention by fishing representatives that, whereas HPMAs policy, as such, was dropped—after various representations of various types were made to urge the Government so to do—I understand that it is a widely held belief in fishing circles that NatureScot is busily working on that topic to pursue what some feel might be HPMAs by another name. I have not seen the factual basis for that, but I wonder whether we might, to take a belt-and-braces approach, write to NatureScot to ask whether it is doing work in that area, and, if so, what that work is, who has asked it to do it and what role in and input to its deliberations, if any, fishing representatives, such as those representing fishermen in the Clyde and the vicinity, might be having.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Fergus Ewing
I note the tragic loss of the petitioner’s three-year-old son and that the petitioner lives opposite where his son is buried. He talks about the family witnessing up to 100 people exercising their dogs daily, with dogs being let off leads or on long leads, resulting in their urinating and defecating on graves and damaging teddies and so on that have been left in memory. I just thought that I would mention that because, plainly, the petition is somewhat unusual, but there is a human tragedy behind it.