The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 858 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
There is a concern that ecocide could have been committed but that it would be hard to hold anyone to account for it, because of the threshold.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
SEPA questioned the costs that are in the financial memorandum on leading on investigating an ecocide event. Other organisations, such as NatureScot, have key environmental protection roles. Section 9 will expand enforcement powers. Do we need to enable other authorities to have enforcement powers?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
You cut me off before the second half of the question. Yes, this is new legislation, but I put on the record that we have heard concerns from some organisations that they are challenged financially to implement the existing legislation. We heard in previous evidence that there has been a doubling of public complaints but the number of prosecutions has significantly declined. Is there an issue with existing law that needs attention as well as the consideration of ecocide? The two issues are linked. That has been suggested to us by different organisations.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
We have been talking about the section 40 offence in the 2014 act. You would prefer this legislation to amending the section 40 offence in the 2014 act—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
Organisations have flagged the issue of the costs of implementing the bill. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency raised concerns that the financial memorandum underestimates the costs that it might have to bear, and NatureScot questioned whether it would need enforcement powers extended to it so that it could work with SEPA in relation to protected sites or ecosystems. We also received evidence from West Lothian Council that it lacks resources in relation to monitoring issues, breaches of planning conditions and situations where local authorities are the first responder to a local event.
Do you have any comment on the need to ensure that there is further investment in public sector organisations so that they can implement the legislation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
A response from the Government on that is important, because different organisations have raised that concern. The other issue that has been mentioned by several organisations is that they are concerned that stronger enforcement of existing law would be as important as creating an ecocide law on top of existing law. There are also concerns about having the legal tools and the resources. Cabinet secretary, you just said that this is a new piece of legislation so it is not for you to address, but concerns have been raised that are not—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
That has come up in evidence.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Sarah Boyack
I was focusing on the actual organisation that would be held to account and on accountability.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
One of the issues that I mentioned was new criminal offences or charges that could be created through secondary legislation. Can you confirm whether the affirmative procedure would be required for such a change? It is about being proportionate in using that opportunity.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
The purpose of my amendments is to fix those problems in the legislation, and I engaged with stakeholders to see how we could do that. It is up to committee members to decide which options they want to support. I was trying to be constructive by increasing accountability and avoiding that non-regression challenge by preventing environmental regulations being inadvertently reduced. I was trying to come up with amendments that would help and strengthen the bill, because, as you suggested, the current wording significantly weakens environmental protections. It is about getting that joined-up thinking and accountability.
My amendment 10 would ensure that changes are substantive and accountable, that we debate such issues openly in the Parliament and that they do not just slip under people’s notice. Accountability cannot be left only to ministerial discretion through secondary legislation. I was trying to drive joined-up thinking and action on the climate and nature crises that we face and that will only get worse. What a minister sees as simplification might weaken environmental protections, so I wanted to include protections in the bill. It is up to the committee members to decide how to vote.
I have listened to Alasdair Allan’s suggestions about what his amendments would do, and I will listen to the rest of the debate.