The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1810 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
The key to delivering a circular economy locally and to creating jobs is to set targets for reuse. Spain, Portugal, France and Belgium are making progress on it, so will the Scottish Government set a reuse target and support local authorities with advice and finance to deliver on it?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
The key issue that I am trying to get at is joined-up information sharing between local authorities. There are records in every local authority, but they are not joined up, which means that people can be registered in several local authorities. That does not make sense, surely.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I tried to vote. I would have voted no.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
This has been a useful and constructive debate about a variety of amendments. We are all trying to strengthen the bill and the work that is done by a range of organisations across the public sector to prevent homelessness, because the issue is not going away.
I will press amendment 306, because this is a now issue. A lot is being done by local authorities and charities, but we need to do more. Strengthening the framework for the ask and act duties is critical, as is linking prevention work across the country so that people see a difference being made.
If the bill is to be successful, some of the amendments that others have lodged will be necessary. Jeremy Balfour’s comments about the housing emergency were bang on. People who are homeless need permanent accommodation, and the issue of people with protected characteristics was raised. Elena Whitham mentioned child poverty. She and Edward Mountain raised employment issues. Meghan Gallacher made a point about shared responsibilities. There was such a lot in what was said.
We do not want the cabinet secretary to say that, although we have not done these things, we have ticked the box, so the bill can be passed. It is about what happens next. I suspect that some of us would be very up for future conversations, because we need to supercharge action against homelessness.
Pam Duncan-Glancy’s comments about care leavers and Mark Griffin’s comments about GPs are critical. Children’s rights are central to what we are doing, because we want to protect current people and future generations in Scotland, including the disadvantaged groups that Maggie Chapman mentioned.
There is an awful lot in what has been said. I hope that the cabinet secretary will be prepared to discuss the issues with us. I also hope that, when I come to press my amendments, I go with the right ones—it is difficult to read the room and to know which ones people will support.
I go back to a point that I made earlier. The cabinet secretary talked about doing more of some things. It would be good for us to be able to influence future consultations and guidance, because ensuring that guidance is implemented is critical if we are to prevent homelessness. That issue could not be more urgent.
I press amendment 306.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
And that is good.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is helpful. Does anyone else want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
How would you amend the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
We have just been talking about organisations and individuals. What happens if it is actually an individual who has committed the alleged crime? Would it be appropriate to prosecute an individual—for example, a member of the public who, by their actions, creates a wildfire that goes on for more than a week and has massive consequences? We have experienced that situation quite recently. Would it be legitimate, under the bill, to prosecute somebody if that was reckless behaviour?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you—that answer was swift.
What about the other witnesses? Do I see nodding heads, or do you disagree?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
If somebody is actually committing ecocide—if that is the allegation—but if they are in compliance with the Government’s regulations, would that be lifted up to the Government to be responsible?
I could leave that question on the table.