The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 885 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
I just want to make a short intervention to agree with a lot of what has been said. People were expecting there to be a substantive bill in the previous parliamentary session, and now, in the current parliamentary session, they have a bill that does not really meet aspirations, although the changes that it makes are welcome. We have to find a way of binding the next Government, whoever it is, to consult widely and introduce legislation, while recognising that crofting has evolved in different areas. That will not be easy, but, because of what is happening to crofting, it will not survive if legislation is not amended substantially in the next five years.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
Is the minister willing to have discussions ahead of stage 3 on amendment 189? I know that the amendment is not the finished article by any stretch, but there is an issue about people being absent but not really being absent and instead using it to enable abandonment. If we could tighten up the rules on that, that would make the situation better. I am not suggesting that people should wait to be reported, but the circumstances in which people can leave their croft for a short period should perhaps be tightened up.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
I will speak to amendments 178, 179, 183, 184 and 187, which try to address a problem created by the right to buy and seek to make it clear that ownership of a croft does not circumvent the obligations of a crofter.
Amendment 178 is a paving amendment, and amendment 179 would add an extra condition that a person must meet to be considered an owner-occupier crofter—that the commission be satisfied that they can meet the owner-occupier crofter duties. The bill introduces an alternative way in which a person can be considered an owner-occupier crofter, via new section 19BA of the 1993 act, by which the commission makes a determination that the person is an owner-occupier crofter. Amendment 183 would provide that the commission cannot make such a determination unless it is satisfied that the crofter can meet the crofter duties.
Amendment 187 would add a new section to provide that, if the commission is not so satisfied that the person can meet the duties, it must direct the person to let the croft to any person as a crofter. It would also provide a regulation-making power for ministers should they need to create other substantive provisions to make this operational.
Amendment 184 would provide that subsections (3) to (7) of section 58A of the 1993 act, which deal with notification and objections, will continue to apply to determinations under proposed new section 19BA of the 1993 act.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
Apologies—I could not unmute, and the host disallowed me. Obviously someone was snoozing somewhere.
Will the assessments have any impact at all? I have been closely watching island communities impact assessments, which are being rolled up into the new system, and I cannot think of one thing that looks as if it has changed as a result of them. Therefore, it would be really good to have an example of any practical changes in the way that things are funded under the new system.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
I have an overarching question on all the instruments. In rural areas, including the Highlands and Islands, which I represent, there are legal aid deserts, and for all sorts of cases people have to go to Glasgow, for example, to get a solicitor to represent them.
Will any of the proposed changes take account of geography, the additional costs of travel and the like in order to make it easier for local solicitors to take on that work and represent folk more locally?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
My sound is working.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
Would you consider rural proofing future policy in this area, which would involve looking through a rural lens at areas where it is really difficult to get access to legal representation?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
I asked about rural proofing policy.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
A lot of farmers and crofters tell us that, when they audit their carbon emissions, the mitigation that they take means that they are net zero, but that does not seem to add together. Has the Scottish Government done any more work on the mitigations that are already in place to take account of them when cutting farm and croft emissions?