The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 896 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
One of the recommendations of the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission was that no further greyhound tracks be permitted in Scotland. What is your response to that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
At the moment, you can do something on licensing? In what regard can you do something on licensing in relation to greyhound tracks?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
Okay, but if someone decided tomorrow to open a greyhound track, they would be able to do that, if their local authority gave them planning permission, because there is no licensing scheme.
10:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
There is no drug testing at Thornton either, so we do not know if there is any substance misuse there.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
Okay. So, you have given it no thought.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
I have nothing to add. I have listened to what the cabinet secretary has said and will not press amendment 82.
Amendment 82, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendments 13 and 83 not moved.
Section 17 agreed to.
Section 18—Processing of information
Amendments 14 and 15 moved—[Mairi Gougeon]—and agreed to.
Amendment 184 not moved.
Section 18, as amended, agreed to.
Sections 19 to 25 agreed to.
After section 25
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
On that matter, would there be a delay? If you are using that power, there are pretty exceptional market conditions and people are quite concerned. If there was a delay between the initial three months and an extension of that scheme under the powers allowed, that could cause issues for those who are really dependent on that support.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
Amendment 73 seeks to extend the length of time for which exceptional market conditions support can continue. Although it would be hoped that such occurrences would be rare and short lived, they could run beyond the three months that is allowed for in the bill. My amendment would increase that time to six months. In doing so, it would not prescribe that every scheme would run for six months; it would simply allow it to do so should the need arise. I hope that the power would very seldom require to be used, but it is needed to provide stability in difficult times.
I move amendment 73.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
Amendment 72 seeks to ensure that people who claim support know the expectations that are placed on them in return for that support before they apply. The amendment ensures that the reasons why support could be refused or recovered in the public interest are clear to all those who apply.
I believe that there are times when Government should recover support that has been paid. I therefore cannot support Edward Mountain’s amendment 169, but I believe that the reasons for doing so must be understood.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Rhoda Grant
Amendment 76 will ensure that, before making regulations under section 13, the Scottish ministers must consult such persons as they consider
“to be interested in or affected by provisions in this section”,
rather than simply those the Government deems appropriate.
Amendment 80 will ensure that grazing committees and, indeed, other co-ops can be collectively supported. Many crofting activities are carried out as part of a collective. Currently, it is difficult to access funding on that basis. It is important to allow individuals who are part of a grazing committee or co-op to apply for support in their own right under a different claim—obviously claiming only once for any activity. That would allow them more access to environmental funding when, collectively, they would be better able to compete against large land holdings, for which support is dependent on the number of features protected. Those with small crofts or farms have often been locked out of environmental support projects because of that, and amendment 80 attempts to right that wrong.
Beatrice Wishart’s amendment 171 seeks to do something similar to my amendment 76, and I will listen to the thoughts of the committee and the cabinet secretary. I hope that there will be support for one of those two amendments.
Amendment 81 is consequential on amendment 80.
I move amendment 76.