The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 524 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Rhoda Grant
I ask people to turn their attention to schedule 1, which sets out an awful lot of the detail. Does it cover all the purposes for which support will be provided as required to replace the CAP and, indeed, provide for a new agricultural policy for us? Does it meet people’s aspirations for the new policy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Rhoda Grant
I am not asking everyone to read schedule 1, but it basically highlights all the things that could receive support under the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Rhoda Grant
I have an even more technical question—sorry about that. Do we need more detail on how the powers in schedule 1 will be used? Also, should there be greater scrutiny of how the new powers—for example, to cap payments—are used?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Rhoda Grant
Nobody has mentioned scrutiny. This is an enabling bill, and a lot of the powers in it relate to where the money is going to come from. Folk might reflect on whether the scrutiny provisions in the bill are enough and write to the committee on that. That issue might not be at the forefront of everybody’s mind, but we need to have adequate scrutiny in the bill over the powers that will shape the policy going forward.
I have a final, small question. We are looking at alignment with the EU CAP. I am picking up that people are broadly supportive of that, but is there any area where that would not be desirable?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rhoda Grant
If someone breached scheme rules, would the money be recovered?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rhoda Grant
I will push you a little further on the “high-quality food” definition. What is produced as part of our agriculture that would fall foul of the definition? I do not understand why you have not just referred to the “production of food”. Why is it
“the production of high-quality food”?
What would be omitted from that definition? What is the purpose?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rhoda Grant
In this instance, the public interest means abiding by the rules or the best use of public money.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rhoda Grant
In what other ways could the public interest be determined?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rhoda Grant
There are powers in the bill to cap, refuse or recover support payments when those would not be in the public interest. On what type of occasion would you envisage using those powers?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rhoda Grant
That raises a huge number of other questions. Who will decide whether someone is a proper person or whether they have used the money as intended? That seems very broad.