Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 896 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Following on from that, I note that some witnesses have told us that part 1 of the bill is not compatible with the UNCRC, because it amends the 1980 act. Is the bill compatible?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Yes—of course it is about being compatible.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Given what you have said before, cabinet secretary, about the complexity of all this legislation, should you have been considering a consolidation bill to bring the legislation into the scope of the UNCRC, rather than an amending act?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

But such an exemption has never been used.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Okay, but the bill’s provisions will fall outwith the UNCRC, because the bill is amending legislation from 1980.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Are there examples of the 1998 act exemption having been used?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Following on from the previous question and the cabinet secretary’s quite clear statement that she is not aware of any act of Parliament that would require action that was incompatible, I want to ask, given the concerns about part 2, whether it is necessary. After all, you do not believe that there is any legislation that would require the provisions in part 2, but it still seems to water down children’s rights.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

But you cannot give any examples of where it would come into play.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Yes.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Under section 11, there is a proposed 10-year restriction to ensure that, if the commission resumes a croft and then assigns it to a tenant, that tenant cannot sell the assignation for 10 years. Does that strike the right balance in stopping the trade in crofts? Does it prevent the commission being accused of giving an asset to someone who will suddenly capitalise on it? We know the value of crofting assignations.