The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 698 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
I am going to get a row.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
My understanding is that, in such cases, the croft would revert to the commission. Would that deal with the issue of exceptional circumstances?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
If we did that in legislation, would it not have a cost attached?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Do you all agree that RME should be removed from the bill? Are you saying that, as it is part of the curriculum, there should be no opt-out in relation to it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Are you saying that the decision should be for the parents alone and that the child should not be able to overrule a parental decision?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Juliet Harris, do you want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Louise Church, do you agree?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Thanks. To turn the argument on its head slightly, should RO be a legal requirement in the first place? I know that that is a controversial question, and I do not want to put anyone on the spot, but I ask it because the bill would allow an opt-out.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
That is perfectly okay. I did not get any answers, but I absolutely get that people do not want to come down on one side or the other, especially when they are here representing others.
Let us move on a wee bit to the conflict that the proposals could cause, which has been touched on. We have heard that it is strange that it is the parents who would have the opt-out right rather than the children. The children would not have an opt-out right under the bill, but they would have an opt-in right if their parent opted to take them out, which seems a bit back to front. Would that cause conflict, or is there likely to be less conflict because it is the parent who will exercise the right and the child is likely to go along with that?
Louise Church, do you want to comment on that? I am picking on you first because you probably understand better what could cause conflict between parents and children.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
That was useful.
My other question has pretty much been answered, but I will ask it, just for clarification. It is about the possibility of, or potential for conflict between parents and children. We all understand that the preference is for the bill to allow the child to make this particular decision, but the fact is that they will be able to do so only if their parent opts them out. That is the only time that they can take a decision that might be contrary to their parent’s belief. Will that create conflict, or would there be more conflict if the child were able to instigate the process and make that decision themselves?