The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 761 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
A lot of the practical changes in the bill seem like common sense—I am thinking of measures such as moving notices on to digital platforms and the three-year cycle for the census. Are there some risks involved in that? For example, with regard to the census, information might become out of date much more quickly. In addition, when it comes to the use of digital platforms, given that crofters tend to be an ageing community, will they have the same level of access? How will you ensure that people have the information that they need when they need it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
We welcome the instrument, as it could encourage free-range breeding in Scotland. However, how will you ensure that chickens that are not bred as free range do not come under these regulations and end up being marketed as “free range”, because of the derogation? How will you ensure that the derogation cannot be used to mark chickens that are normally reared in barns as “free range”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay, and checks will be made at that point.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. So, there is not an issue as such. It is just about being clear.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Is that better? Can you hear me?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
[Inaudible.]
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will very quickly say that I have no relevant interests.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
[Inaudible.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
The concern that my amendment 382 and other amendments in the group try to address is the unintended consequence where it may be more cost effective for a landowner to resume the whole farm rather than part of it, if they need part of it for development. My amendment is quite simple; it just suggests that the valuation should take that into account. However, I am happy to have further discussions with the cabinet secretary, because I think that we need to sort that out. I am not seeking to constrain the compensation that a tenant would get in any way—it is right that they should be compensated. However, if the unintended consequence is that they lose their whole farm rather than part of it, that is obviously not a good situation to be in. On the understanding that we might have discussions ahead of stage 3 on how to sort out that anomaly, I will not move my amendment.
09:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Is there sufficient balance in the proposed aims of the national park between the protection of natural heritage and the sustainable economic development of communities? We have been speaking to the national parks and have learned that their plans were very focused on housing, because there is a degree of need for it, with people not being able to live in the national parks. Do the new aims in relation to the functions of the national park reflect that aspect?