The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1455 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Could self-defence not be argued in court in such cases?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
That is what I thought you said. It is a striking comment. Do the other witnesses share that view about the register?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I know, but I just want to understand—
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
This is a central part of the bill, and that comment is very pertinent, so I just wanted to get your reaction to that. As I understand it, the purpose of putting convicted offenders on the list would be so that the police could monitor them. I acknowledge what has been said about resources and everything else, but that would be the purpose of it, so it is quite interesting to hear that there might be an unintended consequence. Tumay, do you want to comment?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Okay. As you have said, there are many implications, and you mentioned at the beginning the wider roles of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service. Sometimes, we do not talk enough about the role that you have if there is an accident on the M8 or elsewhere and your critical role in saving people’s lives. I will not go into my concerns about shutting the stations in Cowcaddens and Yorkhill, which are in the region that I represent, but I think that Cowcaddens is a good example of a station that fulfils that role. You can correct me if I am wrong, but I assume that the location of a fire station such as the one in Cowcaddens, which is so close to a big motorway—the M8—is critical to the response times for serious accidents that happen on the motorway. Or is that not the case?
12:15Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Are we talking about cases in which a woman has been charged with assault, for example?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I want to explore what Agnes Tolmie said about angry men, which really struck me. First, Agnes, can I just check whether your concern is that the notification requirement for those men to be on the list would almost be a provocation, so it would not keep women safe? Did you mean that it would be provocative and that it might lead to more violence?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Thank you. Lastly, if I may ask—
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. I want to explore how we got here. I am familiar with centralisation, and I know that you supported it. You probably did not think that, in 2025, you would be here telling us about cuts of almost £1 billion, because the point of the exercise was not to make all these cuts. The committee heard from the Fire and Rescue Service management team, which was, at least, clear that it needed a certain amount of money and that otherwise it would have to reduce the head count. In that sense, the union and the management are saying the same thing, although you might disagree with the figures. I would say that this is the starkest warning that I have ever seen from justice partners. The police are saying the same thing that you are saying: you went along with the centralisation, you made the efficiency savings, and now you are coming to the committee and telling us that this is going to impact on the people we represent. I think that it is the most serious situation that I can recall as an elected member.
I am sure that you will know this off by heart, but, in your submission, you said that, in 2024,
“sustained underfunding forced the SFRS to ‘temporarily withdraw’ 10 frontline fire appliances and reduce operational headcount by 166 firefighter posts in September 2023.”
So, it was temporary, but you predicted that it would be permanent, and you were right, because, as you go on to say,
“The inclusion of ‘permanent solutions’ to the cuts imposed in 2023 is evidence that the FBU concerns were well founded.”
Rather than go over the whole 13 years, why do we not start there? Is there another example that would better illustrate where the big cuts have started to happen? What has the responsible minister been saying to you? I presume that you have met with her and discussed it. Can you share that with the committee?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Are you getting any response to that?