The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1438 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Nobody can change that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I am familiar with the Nordic model. I hosted the Swedish prosecutor about 15 years ago, so I know what claims are being made about their model, particularly for human trafficking. It is accepted that some of those models have reduced human trafficking but did you have any discussions with the national agencies about whether the way that the law is framed is a barrier to prosecuting and investigating human trafficking in Scotland? We have the National Crime Agency, which has a decent record on identifying and investigating human trafficking. Are you saying that the way in which the law is framed is a barrier or are you just saying that the model will help to reduce it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
If you have one, yes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Is it the same as—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
That seems to me to be tied in. You are releasing them, but somebody has to check their stated intention to reside permanently outside the UK in order to establish that, do they not?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Presumably, there would be transfer arrangements. Somebody could say, “I am not going to stay in the UK,” and you would release them, but I presume that there is a process, in case they changed their mind.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
These are short-term prisoners, I suppose, but I am thinking of the victims of the crimes that they have committed. I do not know what the range of crimes might be, but I suppose that they are medium to low-level crimes. For the sake of completeness, is it the case that they would go back to their home country and that that would be the end of the matter?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Sweden claims to have reduced human trafficking through the Nordic model. Human trafficking is a crime in Scotland. The National Crime Agency is responsible for reducing it and, to my knowledge it has a decent record. I am therefore saying that surely we are already reducing human trafficking in Scotland through what we are doing. I am asking about the way that the law is currently framed.
It is just a thought, because that is one of the claims that is made about the Nordic model, and I am wondering about the role of the National Crime Agency. Is there a suggestion that there is a barrier to tackling human trafficking?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
She did say that one reason why she has concerns is because the sale of sex has moved online. She said that specifically. You may want to have a look at that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I understand that the SSI is about all the other notification requirements in relation to sex offenders. That is what we are dealing with here. Any information about that offender is vital, so that we know where they are, because that is the purpose of the register. Your answer to Liam Kerr’s question on people who already have a GRC certificate was helpful. That would be consistent with the 2003 act, which I know quite well—believe it or not, I scrutinised it at the time and actually remember it.
I have a similar question. Even if someone is not going through the process of applying for a GRC, there is the requirement to notify if there has been a change of passport. Would the same apply? It might not. My understanding is that the reason why it applies is that, under the 2003 act, you change your gender for all or most purposes, so there would not be a requirement prior to conviction. However, the notification that you have changed your passport name is not covered by the same legislation, if you see what I mean.