The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1493 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
So, do you think that key to making a difference in keeping women safe would be that monitoring?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Your proposal would not involve a risk assessment because, if I have understood it correctly, the requirement to be on the register would be based on the prison sentence and conviction. Would there be no requirement prior to that to assess the risk? I have a reason for asking about that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Thank you very much.
Pam, you said that we need to do something differently, and I agree with you. However, do you not think that, to do something differently, we should maybe start at—actually, convener, this question is probably not about part 1, so do you want me to leave it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I have been on the Criminal Justice Committee for five years so can we take it as read that I understand the seriousness of the offence? That is not why I am asking the question. I am trying to get some clarity. There is an argument that, if we had a smaller register, there would be more chance of monitoring the people who are going to put women at the highest risk. In your proposal, is there no requirement to assess risk? I think that the answer to that is no.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
You have talked about MAPPA quite a lot. How does your proposal for a register relate to that approach?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I was just wondering what you thought about it, though. Do you not think that the focus in education should be on boys? We both agree that violence against women and girls is primarily committed by men, but you think that education should not be specifically—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. First, I acknowledge the amount of work that the member has done. Having been in charge of a members’ bill myself, although it was a wee bit smaller, I realise that there is a lot of work involved.
You have sort of answered this question but what I am interested in hearing about more concisely is not who supports the bill and their evidence, but what the primary purpose of the register would be, as far as you are concerned.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Sorry, can you just answer my question. I am trying to establish the primary purpose, which you are saying is monitoring. Obviously, I recognise that anything that is done could provide a deterrent, but you are saying that the notification requirements and the monitoring would make the difference. Do you think that any aspect of the register should identify the risk related to an individual offender? Is it correct that anyone who had been convicted of a prison sentence on indictment for 12 months or more would qualify to be on the register for domestic abuse offences?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I will ask another question about the register. Did you consider the stigma that might be attached to children and families where the father—or mother, for that matter—is on such a register, should the bill be passed?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
That is fair enough.
Finally, you will recall that I quite closely questioned the minister, Siobhian Brown, at our previous meeting. The Government has said that it does not support the bill, but she did eventually say to me that there are gaps. Have you given that some thought since then? Any bill that gets to stage 2 would be amended anyway, so have you given any consideration to how you could get the Government on board?