The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2128 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Is that accepted by the Crown Office? I think that I am right about the Crown Office saying that it did not think that there would be many prosecutions. That is what Dr Forbes said, although I acknowledge that, as you say, there is sometimes still a point to legislating despite that. Do you think that that situation would change over time?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Yes.
Our papers say that inclusion is
“subject to the requirement that they are liable for removal”
with the
“intention of residing permanently outside the United Kingdom”.
Who establishes their stated intention?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
How do you establish their stated intention? I presume that you have to do that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
When they leave prison, is there a process to transfer them somewhere else?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Let us say that someone changes their documentation prior to them being put on the sex offenders register. Do they have to give the police that information?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
So the risk is something else.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Thank you.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I want to draw the minister’s attention to the question that I have now asked twice. It is a serious question. An apology has been made because Professor Jay was quoted in a debate in which we made a decision on whether we would have an inquiry.
I have asked whether the Government has since spoken to the expert on child abuse, Professor Jay, and I cannot seem to get an answer. It might be that that all happened at the meeting of the working group on 25 November. Can the minister give me some clarity now? Is Professor Jay now satisfied that the minster has taken her expert advice?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
It has been alleged that salmon infested with sea lice were left in a pen that was meant to be completely empty. Animal Equality UK carried out covert filming at the Bakkafrost Scotland farm on Loch Torridon and claims that welfare regulations were breached. Tesco has suspended the farm while it investigates the supplier. In its first report of 2025, the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee found that the Scottish Government is not being responsive enough to the complex needs of the Scottish salmon farming industry and how it interacts with biodiversity, animal welfare and the workforce. Can the cabinet secretary tell me what is being done to ensure that the industry receives better support as well as improved oversight?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I, too, had concerns about the fact that the cabinet secretary was not here to answer what has now become a really important national question. The member and I might slightly disagree on the approach, but we agree that the Government’s complacency is a cause for concern to us in the chamber, to victims and to agencies. I called for a case-by-case review, at the very least, but I got no answer to that call.
Does the member share my frustration that we have to try other ways to get answers that we are not getting in the chamber?