The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1239 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
However, it would apply in relation to the prosecution. The principle of the prosecutor prosecuting in the public interest and not acting on behalf of any victim is the reason why there is a question whether it is appropriate for a victim to discuss with the prosecutor the prosecution of the case and have an understanding of the case.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
Tony Lenehan, do you have anything to add?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
Two weeks ago, I questioned the Lord Advocate and Lady Dorrian specifically on the inclusion of the indictment of murder in the remit of the specialist court. I find that extraordinary. I am not a practitioner, so it would be helpful if you could give a view on that. As a layperson, I think that murder is a plea of the Crown for a reason, even if there is a sexual element. The crucial element is that although, under the bill, murder could, of course, still be prosecuted in the High Court, a Lord Advocate could choose not to prosecute it in the High Court. I would appreciate it if you would comment on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
That is right.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
Does that mean that in the High Court a case would be prosecuted by an advocate depute, but in another court that could be done by either an advocate depute or a procurator fiscal depute?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
It is on cause shown.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
Just for completeness, section 46 allows the prosecutor or accused to say that they do not want to be heard in the specialist court and that they want to be heard in the High Court or the sheriff court. Given what you have said and the evidence that you have given the committee already, it sounds to me as though, whereas at the moment there are rules on where cases can be heard, under the bill there will be no rules at all. In fact, the provisions would mean that the prosecution and the defence would just work it out amongst themselves in which court the case is heard. If that is a concern, at least legislators should have the confidence to say with certainty what cases will be heard in which courts. However, if we pass the bill, it would be completely a matter for the court system to decide where cases are tried. Is that fair to say?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you very much for bringing to our attention your point about the importance of transcripts—that is something else that I think that we will need to take on. I know that a pilot on the use of transcripts is running at the moment, which you should take credit for.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
I am very sympathetic to that point. I think that you have made a very good point from the perspective of survivors. I am just concerned about the volume of cases that would be transferred to the specialist court and how we would achieve that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pauline McNeill
You might not be able to answer this question. Again, I do not fully understand why the Government, when it legislated, said that murder, if it had a sexual element, could be indicted in the specialist court. Had you asked for that? Had you made representations to the Government on that?