The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1604 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. I know that your statutory role is to review and inspect the statutory functions and performance of the Fire and Rescue Service, but it cannot have escaped your notice that we have heard evidence from the Fire Brigades Union and the chief fire officer about the impact of the budget. There is an on-going consultation on fire stations, and we expect closures. Does your role incorporate commenting on the impact of such decisions on the statutory function of the Fire and Rescue Service? The statutory requirement is to respond to a fire, but surely there must be more to it than that, and the concern is that response times could increase, which could cost lives or result in damage to property.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
The last statement that you made there is quite correct because the changes to the rules on corroboration have far-reaching implications.
You have covered a lot of ground and I will not go over it again. Did you say earlier that the uplift in your workload caused by the changes to the corroboration laws was mainly to do with allegations of assault?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
What is the nature of those cases? Are they cases where someone has alleged that they have been assaulted by a police officer?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
But that is not what I am asking about. I am just wondering whether, if the Lord Advocate's reference with regard to corroboration has lowered the bar when it comes to allegations of assault, all those cases should come to you now. After all, there must be lots of cases in which there is a fine line.
We have to think about police officers, too. What happens if we get the balance wrong? His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland made that very point to the committee not so long ago. The police are probably more accountable than any other service. Obviously, any serious allegation must be properly investigated, and there must be compliance with human rights, but I am thinking of the fine line that can be drawn in cases involving allegations of assault by the police. The officer might well say, “I was just doing my job as a police officer in detaining someone”, but the matter might still end up at the PIRC. Given all that, and the fact that the reference on corroboration has changed the law to make it a lesser test, do you think that there should be a review of the assault complaints that are coming to you?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
So the same test would have to be applied if a case were coming to you or if it were going to the Crown Office.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
Thank you. Chief constable, I want to ask you about the 600 community police officers that you asked for. The committee fully supported the idea: communities want to see more visible police officers. How much are you able to do with the budget, short of getting 600 new community police officers?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. I want to ask the chief constable about community policing, but I will first ask Sarah Roughead whether she can clarify something about the budget. I hope that it is an easy question to answer.
The justice and home affairs portfolio is to receive £30.4 million of additional funding in the spring budget revision. The largest component of that is a £24.7 million sum for the United States presidential and vice-presidential visits. Is that figure part of the £90 million uplift or is it additional?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Pauline McNeill
And there would have to be some evidence base. You used the word “allegation”, but what we are talking about is obviously more than that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. This is quite complex, to be fair. I think that you said to Katy Clark that, in the section that the SSI refers to relating to characteristics, the Government has decided to define sex as biological sex. Does that mean that sex is not defined in that way elsewhere in the act? Is it fair to say that it is defined for the purposes of section 12, but it is not defined elsewhere? It is just left without being defined. Is that right? That must be the case.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Pauline McNeill
:It does not define it. Do not confuse me now.
10:30